Trending February 2024 # Bnb Vs Tradecurve, Which Cryptocurrency Is Set For A Bullish Breakout? # Suggested March 2024 # Top 8 Popular

You are reading the article Bnb Vs Tradecurve, Which Cryptocurrency Is Set For A Bullish Breakout? updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Bnb Vs Tradecurve, Which Cryptocurrency Is Set For A Bullish Breakout?

Binance Coin (BNB) has been one of the hardest hit cryptocurrencies since the SEC lawsuit. In total, 13 charges were filed against Binance, which caused Binance Coin to decrease from $305 to a low of $224 in June. 

Now as Binance Coin begins to recover, experts are asking whether or not a bullish breakout could be on the way. At the same time, Tradecurve has seen steady gains throughout June, and now many investors believe July could be the project’s best performing month to date. 

Binance Coin Decline Slows, But Can It Recover?

The SEC lawsuit was a big shock to Binance and the Binance Coin community. It has caused an estimated 1 million users to leave the platform, and trading activity on the platform to decline by 20%. While we’re yet to see the long-term implications of this action, most experts believe it could be bad news for Binance Coin. 

Just one month before the SEC lawsuit, Binance announced that it would be leaving the Canadian cryptocurrency market, and in the process, it will lose thousands of customers. With the exchange now losing more customers in not just the U.S. but Europe too, it’s likely that profits will decline, causing Binance Coins’ price to fall further. 

At the time of writing, Binance Coin was trading at $242.49,19.46% lower than the previous month. Its daily trading volume had also fallen to $400 million, suggesting that any bullish sentiment towards Binance Coin may be decreasing. 

Although it’s difficult to predict when or if Binance Coin will recover, most analysts believe that it’s unlikely that Binance Coin will experience a bullish breakout over the next few months. 

Tradecurve Looks Bullish After 80% Price Increase

Market experts are bullish about Tradecurve following the success of its early presale rounds. After quickly selling out during three rounds, Tradecurve has increased in value from $0.01 to $0.018, offering returns of 80% to bullish investors. 

Tradecurve is the world’s first hybrid exchange that combines decentralized finance with traditional finance. Its exchange is built on Ethereum and provides one of the widest range of asset classes available on a single platform. 

The Tradecurve exchange is fully decentralized, and will let investors trade assets like CFDs and commodities without the need to pass a KYC check. Instead, investors can trade using self-custody wallets and cryptocurrency as collateral. 

As a decentralized platform, investors will be able to trade assets regardless of their location. They will also be able to enjoy an exclusive Metaverse trading academy, as well as copy trading and algorithmic trading opportunities. 

Stage four of the Tradecurve presale has been its most successful yet. 60% of the rounds supply has sold out in just over a week, and now tokens are expected to increase again to $0.025 by mid-July. Due to its current growth, Tradecurve has been nicknamed the next Binance ICO, which started at just $0.11. 

Tradecurve will provide TCRV token holders with a number of rewards, including staking bonuses, trading discounts, voting rights, and discounts on subscriptions. These rewards, as well as predictions of 50x price increases, indicate that Tradecurve is on track for a bullish breakout in Q3. 

For more information about $TCRV presale tokens:

Follow Us Twitter

You're reading Bnb Vs Tradecurve, Which Cryptocurrency Is Set For A Bullish Breakout?

Valorant Vs Csgo: Which Is Better?

Counter-Strike has been an all-time favorite among first-person shooter game enthusiasts. For more than two decades, the game has been more than a hobby or passion for many. It was a lifestyle. However, as Valorant entered the market, it is considered an excellent alternative to Counter-Strike. In this article, we will discuss the exact differences between the two games.

Is Valorant a copy of Counter-Strike?

Valorant might not be a copy of Counter-Strike, but they have copied the same concept. The primary goal in the game is to plant or defuse a bomb, and the main weapon is a gun. Even the part with multiple bomb sites is common. Thus, a comparison between the two games is inevitable.

Valorant vs CSGO: Which is better

More racial and gender representation in Valorant

Valorant is cartoonish, Counter-Strike is realistic

Valorant is difficult and Counter-Strike is easy

Valorant has many different characters and counter strike doesn’t

Counter-Strike has a massive player base and Valorant doesn’t

1] More racial and gender representation in Valorant

While society has been typically male-dominated, times are changing. Counter-Strike uses the concept of terrorists and counter-terrorists which are almost always shown to be males. Even more, the faces were white, but the voices were Latino.

Valorant is quite different. It has almost equal representation of both genders and the powers given to the genders is also equal. Even more, Valorant has characters of all racial ethnicities including Blacks and Asians. Even more, no stereotypes have been attached to the racial characters.

2] Valorant is cartoonish, Counter-Strike is realistic

Counter-Strike has a positive over Valorant that it is very realistic. Rather, CS 1.6 was the first game I ever played that had a realistic arena. Everything in the game has been arranged in a manner that a person could engage with in real life. The weights given to objects in the game and their movements, all are realistic.

In the case of Valorant, everything is seemingly futuristic. Their smoke grenades, the flashbangs, the arena, etc. everything is unlike the real stuff. Interestingly, all these extra elements are far more effective in Valorant.

3] Valorant is difficult and Counter-Strike is easy

Many players claim Valorant is difficult and Counter-Strike is easy. Just like the case with any competitive exam, if it is difficult for you, it is equally difficult for your competitors. Practice will make the player perfect.

However, the reason for these apparent differences is as follows.

Valorant may not be realistic, but the tools are very precise and effective. The smoke grenades in Counter-Strike are a joke and the flashbangs are difficult to use effectively. This is not the case with Valorant. The smoke grenade creates a proper semi-spherical screen that blocks the view. The flashbangs are highly effective, and you do not even need to practice using them.

When the tools used by the opponents are effective, the game seems difficult to play. Also, in the case of Valorant, every character has many secret powers. One must learn about those powers to use them or save himself/herself from them.

4] Valorant has many different characters and counter strike doesn’t

Valorant has characters picked up from a futuristic fantasy comic. This means every character has different powers. Phoenix plays with fire and can create shields. Sage can heal other players and create ice barriers. Other characters have powers accordingly. So Valorant comes with a lot of variety. This also means you will have a lot to learn in the game. This makes Valorant interesting.

Counter-Strike can be learned within days. All players have the exact same power. The guns and grenades are usually the same.

5] Counter-Strike has a massive player base and Valorant doesn’t

Valorant has limited maps, limited goals, and very few players and servers in comparison to Counter-Strike. While Valorant is an amazing game, it will need a long time to make a name in the market. As of now, there are limited players and servers for Valorant. You might keep matching with the same players when playing multiple games. Rather, it feels lonely while playing the game.

In the case of Counter-Strike, other players are quite passionate, and you will rarely match with the same players for multiple matches.

Are Valorant and Counter-Strike free?

Valorant and Counter-Strike are both free of cost. You can download them from the Steam or Riot clients and play them directly. However, since these games are graphics intensive, you will need a computer of sufficient efficiency and hardware.

Inkscape Vs Adobe Illustrator: Which Is Better?

Inkscape vs Adobe Illustrator: Which is better?




Inkscape and Adobe Illustrator are both great vector design software that come with a wide variety of useful features.

Adobe Illustrator is an industry-leading vector-based graphic design tool used by industries all over the world.

Inkscape is a free and open-source vector-based graphic design tool that freelancers and occasional artists can try.

We’ve also compared many other aspects between the two, acknowledging their pros and cons in the article below.

Get the right software to support your ideas!

Creative Cloud is all you need to bring your imagination to life. Use all the Adobe apps and combine them for amazing results. Using Creative Cloud you can make, edit, and render in different formats:




3D models & infographics

Many other artworks

Get all apps at a special price!

We’ve reached a digital age where creating art or graphics is no longer something that is limited by how much talent you have.

There are a wide variety of products out there that can be used to create graphic designs, each with its own unique features and approaches.

However, that in itself is also a problem, since too many options can make it difficult to choose which is the best, especially if you have a specific set of needs in mind.

On that note, we’ve decided to look over the pros and the cons of two very popular graphics design tools, and then compare the two to see which is the best.

As such, we’ve decided to compare Adobe Illustrator, a world-renowned software tool used by professionals everywhere, and Inkscape, a free and open-source program that anyone can use.

This article is great for those who also searched fo the following:

Adobe Illustrator vs Inkscape

Illustrator vs Inkscape

Inkscape vs Adobe Illustrator: Which is better? 1. Adobe Illustrator

1.1 What is Adobe Illustrator?

Adobe Illustrator is a vector graphics editor created by Adobe, and it was originally created for the Mac OS, but it slowly managed to make its way to the Windows platform as well.

It was created after Adobe Photoshop and was supposed to be the vector-based variant of the program since graphic design using raster-based programs did come with its own limitations.

This was especially noticeable when dealing with large-scale projects such as banners and billboards where enlarging the image would eventually lead to it becoming pixelated.

1.2 What features does Adobe Illustrator have?

The UI is designed to be quite intuitive, and anyone familiar with Adobe Photoshop will have no problem whatsoever transitioning to this program as well.

All the tools that you may ever need are present in a sidebar that appears on the left of the screen. These tools allow you to select, create, and manipulate objects or artworks in Illustrator.

Of course, you also have access to sets of tools, each of which acts as menus for other more niche tools:

Selection tools

Paintbrush tools

Pen tools

Pencil tools

1.3 Pros and Cons of Adobe Illustrator


Having skills with using Adobe Illustrator is currently a must-have if you want to land a job as a graphic designer

The program has plenty of features that automate many of the tasks that you would otherwise have to do manually

It is constantly developed, and micro-patches are automatically delivered once any type of bug is reported

Since Adobe is an industry-standard, you won’t have to worry about dealing with incompatible file formats

Files created in Illustrator can be easily imported into After Effects, Premiere Pro, Photoshop and all other Adobe tools


The monthly subscription is only worth it if you yourself make money off of graphics design

It is a bit more resource-intensive than other similar tools

It doesn’t offer support for Linux

⇒ Download Adobe Illustrator for Free

2. Inkscape

2.1 What is Inkscape?

Inkscape is also a vector-based graphic design tool, but unlike Adobe Illustrator, it is completely free and open-source.

Expert tip:

2.2 What features does Inkscape have?

As far as tools are concerned, Inkscape offers almost as many tools as Adobe Illustrator, but the highlit is actually the way you use the program.

The interface is designed to be extremely simple and accessible, even to users that have no background experience using such tools.

More so, the fact that it is open-source makes it available in a wide variety of languages, and it also lets users customize Inkscape’s functionality with add-ons.

Admittedly, you may consider the fact that it is free and the open-source licensing as a big plus, but this too comes with its own set of drawbacks.

2.3 Pros and Cons of using Inkscape


Free and open-source

Uses fewer system resources

User-friendly UI

Works on Windows, Linux, and MacOSX

The community is quite active and extremely friendly


Doesn’t support CMYK color format, so printable materials aren’t something Inkscape can handle

Most industries use Adobe Illustrator, so you’ll have to frequently deal with working with their files anyway

Frequent bugs and issues due to the open-source licensing

Since Adobe Illustrator is the industry standard, having Inkscape skills will not help you get a job as a graphic designer

⇒ Download Inkscape

2.4 Are Adobe Illustrator and Inkscape compatible?

Those of you that want a more hands-on approach at comparing the programs should know that they can do it quite easily since the two have a high degree of compatibility.

For example, Inkscape’s native format is SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics), which is a format also supported by Adobe Illustrator. Unfortunately, the two implementations are not fully compatible.

More so, Inkscape also exports to PS, EPS and PDF, formats that Illustrator can recognize.

3. Inkscape vs Adobe Illustrator: The final verdict

Both tools are great, and while Inkscape’s non-existent price-tag and open-source license may seem like the reason we would call it the winner, it is actually the very thing that makes Adobe Illustrator take our vote.

In a world where everything is standardized and jobs are hard to come by, investing in a program that will greatly increase your chances of success is better in the long run.

More so, Adobe Illustrator is used everywhere, it is always patched and updated, and the customer support is always available for you with the best answers.

Thus, if you want quality and reassurance, there is no way you could go wrong with Adobe Illustrator.

Basically speaking, everything you could ever do with Inkscape you can do with Illustrator, but you cannot say the same about the other way around.

Still experiencing issues?

Was this page helpful?


Start a conversation

Quicktime Vs Vlc Vs Plex – Which Is The Best Media Player?

The right media player can make a huge difference in how you view your favorite movies and television shows. There are dozens to choose from, but it can be hard to narrow down exactly which media player is the right choice.

While most players have basically the same features, there are subtle differences between the various options that heavily influence your experience.

Table of Contents

We’ve taken a look at three of the most popular options—VLC, Quicktime, and Plex—to help you pick the right media player to give you the best overall experience. Let’s start with Quicktime.


QuickTime Player becomes the default option for a lot of users simply because it is bundled into the macOS, but even if you don’t have the program by default there are a lot of reasons to consider it.

For starters, QuickTime Player can play iTunes files. VLC Media Player cannot play iTunes files due to their DRM encryption. If you’re a Mac user immersed into their ecosystem, then you may lean toward an option that allows you to play iTunes purchases with ease. The downside, of course, is that QuickTime Player is only available on Mac systems. Apple officially ceased Windows support of the program in 2024.

QuickTime Player is the go-to option for videos you recorded with your iPhone, but may not fare so well with downloaded videos or more obscure file formats. Another downside is that QuickTime cannot play .srt files, the most common subtitle format. If you like to have subtitles on while you watch, QuickTime might not be the best option.

QuickTime has an intuitive, easy-to-use interface that makes it easy to navigate and find the media you’re looking for. You can also record and edit video with QuickTime, but it requires a QuickTime Pro subscription—a fee of $29.99.


Automatically included with macOS

Works with iTunes files

Easy to use interface


Not compatible with Windows

Doesn’t work with common subtitle files

Less breadth of compatibility than competitors


While QuickTime is the default media player, VLC is often the best option for a host of reasons. The main one is that it supports a massive number of both audio and video file formats. The media player is also open-source and available on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

While no external codecs are necessary, VLC is compatible with an almost-silly number of plugins that allow you to expand functionality far beyond the basics. You can stream audio across your home network with ease through the use of sftp/ssh protocols.

VLC has keyboard shortcuts for nearly every function you can imagine. While not the most vital part of media player for most people, those that value convenience will enjoy the added flexibility this adds to the program.

The downside is that VLC doesn’t have the most attractive interface in the world. The color choices are bland with a late-90s style. All function, no grace. Of course, aesthetics aren’t the most important thing in the world, but VLC also doesn’t have the widest range of function as a music player.

The program lacks functionality when it comes to sorting your music. VLC is intended as a video player. While it can play audio, that isn’t its primary purpose, and that shows in the interface.


Works  with Mac, Windows, and Linux

Huge number of plug-ins

Streaming capabilities

Huge range of file compatibility


No music sorting capabilities

Bland user interface


Buckle up—Plex is a lot to talk about. While it is a media player, it’s more of a server than anything else. When you get Plex up and running, you can stream your media from your devices to almost any other device in your home with the right equipment. If you have a lot of music and movies saved on your computer that you want to watch on the big screen, Plex is the place to go.

There are two versions of Plex: one free, one paid. The great thing about Plex is that the free version is already fully featured. The paid version just adds in a few more benefits that may appeal to smaller numbers of users, like virtual reality support and Sonos integration. For the vast majority of users, the free tier will be more than enough.

If Plex sounds too good to be true, it’s pretty close to it. That said, there are a few areas where it is more of a hassle than a benefit. You can set up your Plex server with ease, but trouble arises when you add media to it.

Actually adding content requires a naming folders and subfolders with specific titles, a task that quickly becomes tedious. If you make it through this process, you’ll be rewarded with a media library you can access from nearly anywhere.

Plex is available for both Mac and PC, but can be streamed to almost any device including mobile phones. It also has Alexa integration, so once a file is added to the Plex directory you can ask Alexa to play it and it will appear.


The free tier is fully functional

Paid version is inexpensive

One of the best options for a home media system

Alexa compatibility


Complicated to add media

More features than are necessary for the average user

The Verdict

It’s a tough choice, but our vote goes with VLC. It provides the most features and widest range of compatibility with audio and video formats. Plex is a close runner-up, but is just too complex and featured for the average user.

If you are a power user that wants to turn your computer into a multimedia mega-center, then Plex is a great choice. On the other hand, if you only need the bare minimum of functionality and you have a Mac, then the built-in QuickTime Player is a solid choice.

Rtx 3070 Vs Rtx 3080 – Which Is Better Value?

Last Updated on September 7, 2023

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30-Series GPUs, in particular, has been a hit. (If you go off sales alone the cards sold out in seconds, but we know this was due to bots and scalpers attempting to resell for much higher prices.) Despite some faulty and frankly disappointing launches, though, the 30-Series GPUs are still very much sought after. But which should you choose? We already had a look at the 3090 Vs the 3080 – the two higher-end cards from this launch – but what about those on a little bit more of a budget?

If for you, like many, the $1499 3090 isn’t realistic, or even necessary, you might be trying to choose between this year’s gaming flagship GPU (the 3080) or the more humble 3070. Like every comparison, there are a lot of factors to consider. We’ve broken them down into specifications, price, and purpose to work out which GPU – the 3070 or the 3080 – is the best value for your money. So let’s get into it.


The 3070 can be compared, performance-wise, to the RTX 2080 Ti. For the same performance levels, the budget aspect of the 3070 makes it a great bargain. The 3070 does have less memory than the 3080, with 8GB compared to 10GB, but it also uses up considerably less power. 

Still, at the same price point as the RTX 2080 Ti, the 3080 has double the performance and power of its predecessor, making it just as much of a bargain in its own right.  

To be honest, the jump in quality between the 3070 and the 3080 is hardly significant compared with the jump from the 3080 to the 3090, and the price difference isn’t huge either. And both are based on NVIDIA’s latest Ampere architecture making them more efficient, powerful, and high-performance than ever. It really does depend on the use case, but we’ll get into that a little later. 

The 3080 is geared towards 4K gaming, but the 3070 can handle both 4K and 1440p graphics. If you’re planning to invest in a 4K monitor, though, you might reap more benefits from the 3080. Still, both are equally capable of running just about any game on the market. 


When it comes to value for money, price point is obviously one of the most important factors. Annoyingly, though, the price difference between the 3070 and 3080 is nowhere near as big as the gap between the 3080 and 3090. With only $200 between the two (with the 3070 priced at $499 and the 3080 priced at $699), it makes this decision even more difficult.

Still, if you’re on a budget the 3070 is the perfect option. It would be wrong to say $200 doesn’t make a big difference and – especially compared to the RTX 2080, which has pretty much the same specs as the 3070 – it is a huge bargain. Especially since the 3070 is cheaper still than the 2080. 

Again, using the 2080 as a marker for value for money brings around the same conclusion. The 3080, for the exact same price, brings double the power, performance, and overall quality. If you have an extra $200 to spare, we say, why not? But the 3070 is the perfect budget option.


So, we touched on this a little bit earlier, but it’s a known fact that the use case is the most important factor when looking at which graphics card to purchase. The use cases between the 3090 and 3080 are much more clear cut though, so it is still a little difficult to say whether the 3070 or 3080 is best for you.

Personally, we think the 3080 is perfect for hardcore PC gamers, especially those looking to move into the 4K gaming sphere. If you already have a 4K monitor and you’re looking for a card with great specs that will last a few years, the 3080 will be ideal. If you need the creme de la creme of GPUs but aren’t able or willing to fork out over $1000, the 3080, again, is perfect for you.

The 3070 is for those who are just getting started with PC gaming, or who are looking to upgrade an old, outdated graphics card. The 3070 is the perfect budget option, so if you need the best graphics cards under $500, the 3070 is definitely for you. With the 3070, you’ll be able to play any game in amazing quality, and let’s not forget it can work for 4K displays, too. The 3070 is also a winner if your PSU can’t handle too much power as it has a considerably smaller consumption rate. 

Final Thoughts

So there you have it. As we said, both of these GPUs are absolutely stellar; powerful, high quality, and better than ever before, there’s no wonder there was so much hype around the launch of the 30-Series. The RTX 3070 is the perfect budget-friendly GPU, while the RTX 3080 might better suit those more experienced in PC gaming. Either way, whichever you choose will have you onto a winner. 

If this article helped you make up your mind, you can find out where to buy the RTX 3070 and the RTX 3080 over on our buying pages. 

Apple Calendar Vs. Google Calendar: Which One Is Better ?

As the number of meetings is increasing due to work from home, the Calendar app on my iPhone is (slowly) becoming one of my most-used apps. However, I’ve been a part of the Google ecosystem for a long time. But I also use Apple Calendar for its ease of use to add events.

If you also find yourself juggling between Google Calendar and Apple Calendar, look no further. This article goes through the in-depth Apple Calendar vs. Google Calendar comparison of some critical aspects. Let’s take a look and help you decide which one you should use to manage your week better.

1. Calendar interface

While all the calendar apps have a similar layout, Google Calendar and Apple Calendar differ on a few fronts.

In both apps, you can switch between layouts, days, weeks, months, or upcoming events. Moreover, events are color-coded to distinguish them easily. However, they’re a bit better on Google Calendar since it shows some text along with the event name.

Moreover, Google Calendar also shows both month and day views at once. This option is not available in the Apple Calendar app. Although a minor feature, it makes a difference.

Winner: Google Calendar

2. Ease of use

A calendar app, in my opinion, should be easy to use. You shouldn’t waste time setting up new appointments or waste time searching for your events.

Winner: Apple Calendar

3. Adding new event options

When you create an event in Apple Calendar and Google Calendar, you’re presented with plenty of options. Let’s take a look at the options and weigh which service is better.

Apple Calendar’s new event creation screen is straightforward. You can give a title to the event, add people to it, tag the event, and set notifications. Now in iOS 15, you can also create events with video call links or specify the location where the event is.

In Google Calendar, when you tap the + button, you are presented with different options such as creating a task, a reminder, an event, or even a goal. The options in event creation are pretty familiar, such as invite, meeting links, tag, and notification settings. However, Google takes the leap over Apple with its Goal option.

In Google Calendar, you can set goals, such as exercising or building a skill. Once you specify what your goal is, Google Calendar will analyze what the best time for that event will be.

For example, when I set the goal to play badminton in the morning, it automatically created events from 8-9 am. If you’ve set up your calendar with many events and want to find time for some activity periodically, Google Calendar’s Goal option is a must-use.

Winner: Google Calendar

4. Calendar notifications

Both Apple and Google offer a wide variety of choices when it comes to customizing notifications. For Google, you can set default settings for every event, such as reminding you about the event 10 minutes before the start time, as well as remind you about the event via email. Moreover, Google allows you to set custom default settings for custom calendars.

For Apple, the default is set for 10 minutes before the event, which you can customize on a per-event basis. However, Apple’s “Time to Leave” is unique. If you’ve set a location for the event, Apple Calendar analyzes your current location, traffic, and time it takes to reach the event location and suggests you a time to leave so that you can reach in time.

Google doesn’t offer any such capabilities.

Winner: Apple Calendar

5. Integration with third-party calendars and services

Google Calendar has some of the best integration with third-party calendars. You can add events from any third-party source, using links or importing them directly using a file (even CSV is supported). You can also request access to the calendars of your colleagues using their email ID.

Moreover, if you’re a sports fan, Google allows you to import sports fixtures directly into the calendar and supports many sports. For example, you can import the calendar for IPL matches of your favorite team. Next time, you won’t miss a match.

Apple doesn’t offer this functionality in its app. Though it can import Holidays and subscribe to calendars via a link, that’s about it.

Winner: Google Calendar

6. Adding new event suggestions

Google wins this race with ease. Google automatically adds any events that come to your email, such as flight tickets or restaurant reservations, directly to the Google Calendar. This is great since you don’t have to open your email every time you see the event details. Everything is there in front of you.

Apple Calendar also offers similar functionality, though it only suggests you add an event manually. For example, if I receive a text with a date and time in the message, iOS would highlight the date and time so that you can create an event by tapping it. However, it doesn’t add the event automatically.

Some might say that the event suggestion is better since the calendar will be filled with non-important events, but if you’re like me and want to see everything in one place, Google calendar is the one for you.

Winner: Google Calendar

7. Data privacy

Whenever you’re using Google services, this is one area you usually expect to miss out on. However, with recent Google Calendar policy changes, Google has stopped using the calendar data for tracking.

Calendar events aren’t scanned like Gmail and thus not used for tracking purposes. Google Calendar’s privacy policy says:

Apple, on the other hand, maintains user’s privacy here too. All the data used in Apple Calendar is encrypted, and the company doesn’t use any of the data for personalized ad targeting or others.

Winner: Tie

8. Security

When it comes to security, both Google Calendar and Apple Calendar face one big problem. Users, especially during the pandemic period, are reporting an increase in the number of calendar spam. Though both Google and Apple have implemented measures to tackle the calendar virus, sadly, it’s still here. If you’re facing the calendar spam issue on your iPhone, here’s how to fix it.

Apart from the spam, Google Calendar and Apple Calendar do a fair job of keeping phishy events out. However, since both calendars are plagued with spam issues, there isn’t a clear winner here.

Winner: None

9. Availability

Availability is one of the areas where Apple seems to lose points in every comparison. Like its other apps, Apple Calendar is exclusive to Apple devices. This means that the Apple Calendar app is available only on iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, and Mac. You can access Apple Calendar via iCloud on Windows and Android devices as well, but it’s not as intuitive.

On the other hand, Google Calendar is accessible from almost any platform. It has official apps for iOS and Android devices, and you can easily access Google Calendar from anywhere using a web browser. The experience across all the devices is similar, plus Google Calendar’s web app is pretty interactive and easy to use.

All in all, when it comes to availability, you just can’t beat Google, eh?

Winner: Google

Keeping all the features and aspects in mind, in the Google Calendar vs. Apple Calendar war, Google Calendar takes the cake. It’s well implemented and neatly integrated with the most used email service in the world and comes on top if you’re looking for a Calendar app that works well across devices (even smart speakers, TVs, and even displays).

You may like to read these as well:

Author Profile

Update the detailed information about Bnb Vs Tradecurve, Which Cryptocurrency Is Set For A Bullish Breakout? on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!