Trending December 2023 # Ipod, Iphone Batteries Will Be Made Replaceable Under Eu Law? Not Really… # Suggested January 2024 # Top 16 Popular

You are reading the article Ipod, Iphone Batteries Will Be Made Replaceable Under Eu Law? Not Really… updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Ipod, Iphone Batteries Will Be Made Replaceable Under Eu Law? Not Really…

Apple appears already in compliance with new European Union guidelines demanding responsible battery recycling and replacement schemes under the new Battery Directive. (The EU hosts an extensive Q&A document on the Battery Directive online.).

This is revised EU legislation that aims to protect human health and the environment by ensuring waste batteries are properly collected and recycled.

Some reports have claimed the Battery Directive means Apple will in future be forced to make batteries in its iPod and iPhone players user replaceable, but this isn’t the case: Apple is already in compliance with the Directive becuase it takes responsibility for replacement and disposal of old batteries, and already offers a free iPod (and mobile phone) recycling schemes in Europe. 

It’s no surprise there’s critical misunderstanding as to the nature of the Battery Directive. Perhaps because many parts of Central and Southern Europe are already suffering early effects of global warming, Europe is years ahead of the US in terms of enforcing environmental legislation. Apple’s stated commitment to catching up and outpacing these considerations in its product design are continuous and well-reported.

Adopted by the European Parliament and Council in 2006, the revised Batteries Directive should be transposed by Member States into national law effective last month, though (as ever when dealing with such things) there’s some tardiness in the application.

s the EU describes the bill, one key change includes a requirement that, in line with the principle of producer responsibility, “battery producers have to finance the costs of the collection, treatment and recycling of waste batteries.”

Additional concerns include:

– Requirements governing the collection or take-back of all types of batteries and setting national collection targets for portable batteries. These require the collection of at least 25% of the portable batteries used annually in each Member State by 2012, rising to 45% by 2023.

– A requirement that all batteries collected must be recycled (with possible exemptions for portable hazardous batteries).

– A restrictions on the use of mercury in all batteries and on the use of cadmium in portable batteries.

– A ban on the landfilling or incineration of automotive and industrial batteries.

– A requirement that recycling processes for different types of batteries must meet specified efficiency levels.

The new directive revises an existing directive on batteries from 1991 which has not succeeded in controlling adequately the risks they pose or creating a homogeneous framework for their collection and recycling. For example, almost one in two ‘portable’ batteries (small, sealed batteries, as opposed to industrial or automotive batteries) sold in the EU in 2002 was sent for final disposal in landfill dumps or incinerators instead of being recycled after use. This was the case even for batteries that had been collected separately at the end of their useful life.

Batteries contain a range of metals which are harmful to human health and the environment, including in some cases the hazardous heavy metals lead, cadmium and mercury, all three of which are extremely toxic and likely to leak into environments surrounding places where they’re dumped or disposed.

Dealing with these issues is on the agenda at Apple, with board member and former vice president Al Gore saying in his film, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, “We’re facing a global crisis and action is required”. 

As a result, Apple was the first major computer manufacturer to eliminate the use of CRTs in mid-2006 and plans to completely eliminate the use of arsenic (in 2008) and mercury (as soon as technically and economically feasible) in its displays. Apple will completely eliminate use of Brominated Flame Retardants (BFRs) and PVC by the end of this year.  Its “small remaining applications” for beryllium are also “a future target for phase-out,”.  iPods and iPhones use mercury-free LED screens, as do some Apple laptops, beginning with the 15-inch MacBook Pro.

In Europe, principal rules that already affect Apple include the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive and the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive, the latter law caused Apple to end European sales of Airport Base Stations, eMacs and iSight cameras in June 2006.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You're reading Ipod, Iphone Batteries Will Be Made Replaceable Under Eu Law? Not Really…

What Is Gdpr? Everything You Need To Know About The Eu Privacy Law

It’s a year and a half since the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was enforced in the European Union. The main goal of the regulation was to give individuals greater privacy, clarity and control over how their data is used by online businesses, organizations and third parties. Under GDPR, companies must now give much more information on how they use and retain individuals’ data – whether it’s on websites, employment contracts, or online forms.

In this article we discuss exactly what GDPR is, what it means to the regular person, and the ways in which it’s been implemented since its enforcement last year.

What Is GDPR?

The idea of GDPR is to make EU laws relating to online privacy and data protection better-suited to the complexities of the online era. Many of the biggest online businesses rely on the steady stream of personal data we give away every day we’re on the Internet – from our cookies to Google searches to details that we enter into online surveys or other forms.

The big business of the internet is pretty much fueled by our data, and the idea of GDPR is to give us some more clarity and control over how it’s used, as well as force companies to be more responsible over what data they procure from us and how they use it.

This sounds good, but what exactly does it mean? Here are the key points concerning GDPR:

An individual’s, or “data subject’s,” personal data can only be processed if one of several “lawful purposes” are met. These include the individual giving their consent to process data, performing tasks in the public interest, protecting the vital interests of other individuals, or several other such “purposes.”

Subjects need to give their consent for data processing (hence, all those GDPR notices that started appearing on websites everywhere).

GDPR monitors companies, demanding that “appropriate technical and organizational measures” are taken to minimize risk of data abuse or breach.

Data security incidents that pose a threat to the “rights and freedoms” of data subjects must be reported to higher authorities within 72 hours.

Data collected from subjects gets anonymized for privacy protection.

The “right to be forgotten” allows users the ability to request that their data be erased from a database entirely. The user also has the right to ask the website to no longer process their data if they do not want it erased entirely. If a company has shared a user’s data with other parties, they all need to be notified about any erasures, corrections, or restrictions. The user must have the right for all their data processing to be halted from all parties

Data-handlers, made up of “controllers” (people and bodies who “determine the purposes and means of processing personal data”) and “processors” (people or bodies that process data on the controller’s behalf), are accountable for data being mishandled and can be fined if they’re found not to comply with the GDPR data-handling regulations.

All of these rights come with complementary obligations enforced on companies, and they could face severe consequences if they do not comply. The amount of detail put into this piece of legislation makes it perhaps one of the largest digital data privacy protection laws in the world.

What Effects Is GDPR Having?

The EU has not been messing around in enforcing GDPR and cracking down on companies that it believes to have fallen afoul of its regulations. The most high-profile GDPR case currently involves WhatsApp and the Irish Data Protection Commission, which has raised concerns over whether WhatsApp sufficiently informs its users about how it processes their data.

Right now the draft decision on the fine WhatsApp is expected to pay has been pushed back to 2023 after WhatsApp’s lawyers had a procedural complaint accepted.

In November 2023, the UK’s data protection agency issued warnings to ad tech companies over the processing of sensitive data and the contracts used to share data between vendors.

In November, Microsoft amended the privacy policies on its cloud contracts after an investigation from the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) raised concerns that its contracts and its role as a data processor for EU institutions wasn’t compliant with GDPR.


As you can see, the GDPR has caused a lot of privacy-related conflict between online businesses and the European Union. While companies are showing a willingness to abide by the GDPR’s stipulations, it’s clear that many of them have a long way to go before they’re fully compliant, and we’re likely to see the fines and warnings coming in thick and fast as companies are forced to adapt to the dramatically overhauled laws surrounding online privacy in the EU.

Robert Zak

Content Manager at Make Tech Easier. Enjoys Android, Windows, and tinkering with retro console emulation to breaking point.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Nintendo: Focus Is On Ip Not Mobile, Nx Will Be Very Different

Nintendo: focus is on IP not mobile, NX will be very different

Although it seems that the sleeping dragon that is Nintendo has started to rouse from its deep hibernation, perhaps it is wise to still rein in expectations and throttle down the excitement. Newly minted company president Tatsumi Kimishima sat down with TIME Magazine to reveal as much as he could about his plans for Nintendo. And there might be some disappointment for those wishing Nintendo would make a stronger stance on mobile. The good news? Kimishima is at least promising that the Nintendo NX console will be very different from the much criticized Wii platform.

Although Kimishima denies reports quoting him as saying that he predicted the Wii U would be a failure, he does admit that the console has had problems. That said, he also says that the company is committed to still developing software for the Wii U, even with the NX console already in the pipeline. On the one hand, it does show Nintendo’s loyalty to those who stuck with it through thick or thin. On the other hand, it also demonstrate’s the company’s stubborness and reluctance to cut ties with the past baggage.

As for the Nintendo NX, Kimishima is of course not saying much. But one thing is hopeful, it won’t be a Wii U + 1. He says that it will be unique and different. It’s the long overdue departure from the Wii platform.

“That being said, I can assure you we’re not building the next version of Wii or Wii U. It’s something unique and different. It’s something where we have to move away from those platforms in order to make it something that will appeal to our consumer base.”

He admits that explaining the Wii U was quite difficult, because it was difficult to demonstrate how the new Wii U would differ from the original Wii. Convincing people to move over to the new console was difficult. The implication here is that the NX would be so different that Nintendo would no longer have that problem. Other than that, however, the console remains shrouded in mystery.

One thing that might be certain is that the NX won’t be based on a mobile platform. Nintendo, perhaps to the disappointment of many, remains cautious, almost ambiguous, about mobile devices. Nintendo won’t “blindly” port its IP to mobile devices, so don’t expect the latest and greatest Mario, Zelda, or Pokemon titles to suddenly become available on your smartphone. Like what his predecessor, the late Satoru Iwata, would say, they are more interested in using mobile to wean gamers into the Nintendo brand.

In the end, Kimishima’s spiel is all about NIntendo’s IP, which he mentions quite a lot in the interview. His main focus is in making sure that IP goes around, which doesn’t necessarily mean porting titles to devices other than its own gaming hardware. In his mind, what will bind all of those together will be the Nintendo Account and My Nintendo club, which will seemingly be the focus of most of his efforts during his term.


Will Bu Be Underwater In 30 Years?

Will BU Be Underwater in 30 Years?

The colored sections of the map above show portions of the Charles River Campus that could be flooded in 30 years, according to a new report that has grimmer predictions than federal flood models. Map courtesy of First Street Foundation

Climate Change

Will BU Be Underwater in 30 Years? University experts discuss new data about climate change flooding

Will the BU Class of 2050 be forced to paddle to some classes in wetsuits? You’d think so after reading data suggesting that parts of BU’s campuses are likely to face greater-than-expected flooding in 30 years due to climate change. First Street Foundation, a New York-based nonprofit research and technology group, says that nearly twice as many properties across the United States as the government currently projects are at risk of being underwater by then. The extreme weather events and storm surges from rising sea levels caused by climate change will be the culprits, says the group.

The report assembles data and maps for addresses around the nation. Its map for BU are included, along with University experts’ answers to three questions about our flood future.



A With Dennis Carlberg, Adam Pollack (GRS’23), Pamela Templer

BU Today:

What locations on campus are prone to being flooded in 30 years, and what makes them more vulnerable than elsewhere?

Dennis Carlberg, associate vice president for University sustainability: The vulnerability assessments we’ve completed for the University show that in general, the Medical Campus is more vulnerable to sea level rise than the Charles River Campus. Since water seeks its own level, we’ve identified the low-lying areas of the campuses as those with the greatest vulnerability to flooding. The lowest sections of the University are the Medical Campus and the east half of the Charles River Campus, especially along Bay State Road and near Myles Standish Hall. The Fort Point Channel seawall near the Medical Campus is the weak link in protecting the city of Boston. The top of a section of the Fort Point Channel seawall is more than two feet below the top of the dam, creating the low point for flooding from the sea.

The Medical Campus also faces areas of potential flooding, according to the report. Map courtesy of First Street Foundation

BU Today:

First Street says current Federal Emergency Management Agency models often underestimate the number of properties at flood risk. Why?

Adam Pollack (GRS’23), College of Arts & Sciences earth and environment PhD student, who studied First Street’s data: FEMA flood maps are typically generated based on flood frequency analyses, statistical analysis, or rainfall-runoff models. These models are done independently, meaning that flood zones in Massachusetts and New York are not made in the same analysis. In contrast, the model component of First Street is continental-scale and has more full mapping of inland flood hazard than outdated FEMA maps. Empirical validation of these models is tricky—we don’t have databases of property-level flood exposure over time, which would be very useful. That being said, the outdated nature of many FEMA flood maps, the use of discrete boundaries, and the fact that much of the observed flooding in the historic record occurs outside of the 100-year flood zone [areas with a one percent annual chance of flooding] seem like circumstantial validation [of First Street’s model].

BU Today:

Can the efforts of BU and others to mitigate the effects of climate change do anything to avert this predicted flooding?

Explore Related Topics:

How Much Will Luna Classic Be Worth In 2025?

Are you thinking of holding Luna Classic in case of a price breakout?

You’re not alone. Luna Classic rocketed back into the top 50 cryptocurrencies by market cap in September. Taking everyone by surprise, the LUNC market cap grew from $570 million to $3.2 billion in the space of two weeks.

Had Luna Classic held on to a market cap of $3+ billion it would be a firm top 20 cryptocurrency once more.

Will Luna Classic recover once more? Will LUNC be a winning investment for your crypto portfolio?

Let’s take a look at price predictions for Luna Classic in 2025.

Can Luna Classic reach $1 price by 2025?

The price of Luna Classic in December 2023 is $0.00013.

But Twitter, Reddit and other forums are full of talk about LUNC recovering to a price of $1. It’s an attractive prospect. It would mean a 751,000% price increase – enough to turn a $100 LUNC investment today into $750,000 within two years.

So how likely is it?

There are two paths LUNC can take to reach $1: by market cap, or by burning tokens. 

Let’s take a look at each.

#1 – Luna Classic reaching $1 by investment alone

Here’s the implied market cap Luna Classic would require to hit the following price increases at the current token supply:

0% increase – $0.00013 price – $800 million market cap

7,000% increase – $0.001 price – $6 billion market cap

7,500% increase – $0.01 price – $60 billion market cap

75,000% increase – $0.1 price – $600 billion market cap

751,000% increase – $1 price – $6 trillion market cap 

As you can see, it would be practically impossible for Luna Classic to reach a $6 trillion market in the next 24 months. SUch growth would make LUNC six times larger than the entire crypto industry at present.

The crypto industry is predicted to be valued at $4.5 trillion by 2030. So even if Luna Classic becomes a top 10 cryptocurrency in the next two years, there’s not enough money in the industry to give LUNC a $6 trillion market cap.

A $60 billion market cap that gets LUNC to $0.01 – or 1 cent – could be more possible. It’s a bigger market cap than BNB and USDC at present, but in the event of a bull market it could happen. At the all-time high, the BNB market cap hit $109 billion.

But of course, this would require LUNC to be one of the most attractive assets in crypto.

#2 – Luna Classic reaching $1 by burning

Burning Luna Classic means reducing the required market cap figures you saw above.

Say the community burns 30% of all Luna Classic tokens currently in circulation. That then reduces the implied market required to reach 1 cent by $20 billion. Such a successful burn rate would no doubt help draw huge investment to Luna Classic.

Unfortunately, Luna Classic is way off track.

After the burn rate was cut in October from 1.2% down to 0.2% of each LUNC transaction, the monthly burn rate fell from 18.8 billion LUNC to 9.2 billion LUNC in November. At this rate, it would take at least 20 years to burn 30% of the LUNC supply if things stay the same.

Compare this with hit altcoins like EverGrow, which burned 1% of its supply in November.

EverGrow is the fastest-burning crypto token after it launched an NFT marketplace – LunaSky – which sends 100% of its revenue to burn EverGrow. There’s a 2% burn tax on each transaction. All this puts EverGrow on track to burn about 30% of its circulating supply by 2025.

The price pumps are expected to be dramatic.

5 Things I’d Really Love To See From The Next Iphone

There’s been all sorts of mutters, speculations, and guesses surrounding the next iPhone. Some of the ideas sound great, while others sound pretty terrible.

Needless to say I think we all have our own personal wish list of things that we would like to see on the next iPhone, so I thought I’d share with you a few of mine. Obviously, these are just wishes, not necessarily realities, but hey, it’s nice to dream, isn’t it?

My first wish for the next iPhone is none other than…

1080p Video Capture

This is really a no-brainer next step. 1080p is the de facto standard for video capture now, and the next iPhone should at least meet the curve if it’s not ahead of the curve.

This would also allow for us to steam 1080p content to the Apple TV, or the next-generation Apple TV if it isn’t feasible to enable 1080p on the current gen device.

1080p capturing would be most beneficial for use over AirPlay since it’s unlikely that your eyes could discern a difference between 720p and full HD on such a small screen.

GSM + CDMA Capabilities

Another no brainer here; instead of Apple creating two devices, why not make one iPhone capable of being used on any network? In the end that could cut down on prices, and customer confusion.

It would also be nice to be able to travel with your iPhone virtually anywhere and still be able to use the device.

720P Front Facing FaceTime Camera

FaceTime is cool and all, but the entire SD experience is a bit on the meh side. Honestly, I can’t remember the last time I used FaceTime due to its pathetic picture quality and shoddy sound.

Even over a fat Wi-Fi connection, FaceTime is a 2nd tier experience when compared to Skype on the Mac.

Since the new Macs feature FaceTime HD capabilities, I think it’s a sure bet that the mobile devices will follow suit going forward.

Back to Aluminum

Let’s face it, aluminum is virtually an Apple trademark by now; the Mac has it, the MacBook has it, the iPad has it, even Apple’s peripherals have it.

It’s time to go back to the iPhone’s roots with the next iPhone. Plus, seeing those weathered iPhone 2G pictures floating around makes me long for the simpler days when I didn’t have to worry about shattering glass on both the front and the back of my phone.

Apple, the glass was cool, but it’s time to head back to the design that you’re known for.


It’s on every new Mac available, and will continue to become prevalent with each new Apple hardware release. At least throw in an optional 30-pin to Thunderbolt connector for those of us that have invested in new Apple hardware.

I don’t know about you but I’m sick of waiting half an hour or more to sync my music library. Obviously this will be less of an issue once Apple’s cloud solution comes into focus, but it’s still nice to have local data for those times when you don’t have a reliable network connection.

Wrapping it up

I honestly don’t see anything in that list that would be out of the question for the new iPhone. All of those options are certainly feasible, and might just come to fruition.

What do you think? Do you think any of my aforementioned wishes are mere pipe dreams better suited for an alternate reality? Is there anything that you’re dying to see that I missed? I tried to keep this at more of a hardware level, as iOS 5 is a different beast altogether.

Update the detailed information about Ipod, Iphone Batteries Will Be Made Replaceable Under Eu Law? Not Really… on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!