You are reading the article Openai Raises Concerns Over Eu’s Ai Regulations, Threatens To Cease Operating In Europe updated in December 2023 on the website Kientrucdochoi.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Openai Raises Concerns Over Eu’s Ai Regulations, Threatens To Cease Operating In Europe
OpenAI, the renowned artificial intelligence company behind ChatGPT, has expressed its worries about the European Union’s proposed AI Act. During a recent visit to London, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, OpenAI voiced his concerns and threatened to cease operating in Europe. Further, he warned that if compliance with the regulations becomes untenable, the company may be forced to withdraw its services from the EU. With the potential implications for OpenAI’s operations in Europe, this development has sparked significant debate and attention. Let’s delve into the details of the EU’s AI Act and explore the potential consequences of OpenAI’s chúng tôi Read: OpenAI CEO Urges Lawmakers to Regulate AI Considering AI Risks
The EU’s Proposed AI Act and its Objectives
The European Union has embarked on a groundbreaking initiative with its proposed AI Act. It is being hailed as the first primary regulatory legislation concerning AI worldwide. The act primarily focuses on regulating artificial intelligence systems and safeguarding European citizens from potential AI-related risks. The European Parliament has already shown overwhelming support by voting to adopt the AI Act, with a tentative adoption date set for June chúng tôi Read: White House Calls Tech Tycoons Meet to Address the AI Threat
The Three Risk Categories Defined by the AI Act
To address varying degrees of risks associated with AI systems, the AI Act proposes a classification into three distinct categories:A. Highest Risk Category:
The AI Act explicitly prohibits using AI systems that pose an unacceptable risk, such as those resembling the government-run social scoring systems observed in China. Such prohibitions aim to preserve individual privacy, prevent potential discrimination, and protect against harmful social consequences.B. Specific Legal Requirements:
The second category pertains to AI systems subject to specific legal requirements. An example mentioned in the act is using AI systems to scan resumes and rank job applicants. The EU intends to ensure fairness and transparency in AI-driven employment practices by imposing legal obligations.C. Largely Unregulated Category:
AI systems not explicitly banned or listed as high-risk fall into this category, which means they would remain largely unregulated. This approach allows flexibility while leaving room for innovation and development in AI chúng tôi Read: Europe Considers AI Chatbot Bans Following Italy’s Block of ChatGPT
Tech Companies’ Pleas for Caution and Balance
Numerous US tech companies, including OpenAI and Google, have appealed to Brussels for a more balanced approach to AI regulation. They argue that Europe should allocate sufficient time to study and understand the technology’s intricacies, effectively balancing the opportunities and risks. Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, recently met with key EU officials to discuss AI policy, emphasizing the importance of regulations encouraging innovation without stifling progress.
Transparency and Safety Considerations
OpenAI has faced criticism for its lack of transparency regarding its AI models. The recent release of GPT-4 generated disappointment within the AI community due to the absence of information about the training data, cost, and creation process. Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s cofounder and chief scientist, defended this position by citing competition and safety concerns. Sutskever emphasized the collaborative effort and time required to develop AI models. Furthermore, he noted that safety would become even more crucial.
As the debate surrounding AI regulations intensifies, OpenAI threatens to cease operating in Europe because the EU’s AI Act has generated significant attention. The proposed legislation aims to balance regulation and innovation. Thus, ensuring AI systems do not pose undue risks while allowing room for progress. OpenAI’s concerns highlight the challenges companies face when navigating complex regulatory frameworks. As the adoption of the AI Act approaches, the discussions on the future of AI regulation will undoubtedly continue to captivate the tech community and policymakers alike.
You're reading Openai Raises Concerns Over Eu’s Ai Regulations, Threatens To Cease Operating In Europe
OpenAI, the AI research firm behind ChatGPT, has released a new tool to distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated text.
Even though it’s impossible to detect AI-written text with 100% accuracy, OpenAI believes its new tool can help to mitigate false claims that humans wrote AI-generated content.
In an announcement, OpenAI says its new AI Text Classifier can limit the ability to run automated misinformation campaigns, use AI tools for academic fraud, and impersonate humans with chatbots.
When tested on a set of English texts, the tool could correctly say if the text was written by AI 26% of the time. But it also wrongly thought that human-written text was written by AI 9% of the time.
OpenAI says its tool works better the longer the text is, which could be why it requires a minimum of 1,000 characters to run a test.
Other limitations of the new OpenAI Text Classifier include the following:
Can mislabel both AI-generated and human-written text.
AI-generated text can evade the classifier with minor edits.
Can get things wrong with text written by children and on text not in English because it was primarily trained on English content written by adults.
With that in mind, let’s look at how it performs.
Related: AI Text Detection Software: Can They Detect ChatGPT?Using OpenAI’s AI Text Classifier
The AI Text Classifier from OpenAI is simple to use.
Log in, paste the text you want to test, and hit the submit button.
The tool will rate the likelihood that AI generated the text you submitted. Results range from the following:
Unclear if it is
I tested it by asking ChatGPT to write an essay about SEO, then submitting the text verbatim to the AI Text Classifier.
It rated the ChatGPT-generated essay as possibly generated by AI, which is a strong but uncertain indicator.
This result illustrates the tool’s limitations, as it couldn’t say with a high degree of certainty that the ChatGPT-generated text was written by AI.
By applying minor edits suggested by Grammarly, I reduced the rating from possibly to unclear.
OpenAI is correct in stating that it’s easy to evade the classifier. However, it’s not meant to be the only evidence that AI wrote something.
In a FAQ section at the bottom of the page, OpenAI states:
“Our intended use for the AI Text Classifier is to foster conversation about the distinction between human-written and AI-generated content. The results may help, but should not be the sole evidence when deciding whether a document was generated with AI. The model is trained on human-written text from a variety of sources, which may not be representative of all kinds of human-written text.”
OpenAI adds that the tool hasn’t been thoroughly tested to detect content containing a combination of AI and human-written text.
Ultimately, the AI Text Classifier can be a valuable resource for flagging potentially AI-generated text, but it shouldn’t be used as a definitive measure for making a verdict.
Featured Image: IB Photography/Shutterstock
Most AI stocks face strong headwinds, from high inflation and rising interest rates, here are the 10 of them
In this modern world, the rise ofLemonade
Lemonade is reinventing the insurance business, including how consumers apply for coverage and get claims approved. Its first AI bot, “Maya”, can approve or deny applications in two minutes, while its other bot, “Jim”, can make decisions on payouts to customers in as little as three seconds. The company had a rough first quarter due to payouts related to the “Texas Freeze” — another reason why the stock is down 65% from the all-time high it hit in January.Riskified
As the hype from its July IPO has faded, Riskified has been hit hard. It’s now down 47% from its all-time high. Riskified uses AI to detect fraud in e-commerce transactions, and it has been effective at doing so. The company has a chargeback guarantee- if its platform approves a fraudulent order, it will cover the losses its client takes- and these losses are represented in its cost of goods sold.Upstart Holdings
Fintech lending platform Upstart Holdings, which uses artificial intelligence to evaluate borrowers’ creditworthiness, has also fallen victim to rising interest rates, with shares down more than 90% from their peak last October. Upstart crashed 56% in one day on May 10 when it reported earnings and cut its full-year revenue expectations to US$1.25 billion from US$1.4 billion.Affirm
Affirm, the buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) startup which offers interest-free pay schedules on some purchases and counts Peloton as its largest retail partner, has fared even worse this year. Its stock is down 81%. The fintech firm went public in January 2023 and has never been profitable, posting a net loss of US$54 million in the first quarter of the year, and Apple launched a BNPL service to directly compete with Affirm this month.Carvana Co.
Carvana Co., together with its subsidiaries, operates an e-commerce platform for buying and selling used cars in the United States. The company’s platform allows customers to research and identify a vehicle; inspect it using the company’s 360-degree vehicle imaging technology; obtain financing and warranty coverage, purchase the vehicle, and schedule delivery or pick-up from their desktop or mobile devices.Peloton
Peloton was one of the biggest winners of 2023 when work-from-home white-collar Americans bought its stationary exercise bikes and subscriptions in droves while gyms were closed during pandemic lockdowns. The stock rose almost sixfold from its September 2023 IPO at US$29 per share to a peak of US$167 in January 2023 after the company recorded its first two profitable quarters to wrap up 2023.Aurora
Aurora is delivering the benefits of self-driving technology safely, quickly, and broadly. Founded in 2023 by experts in the self-driving industry, Aurora is revolutionizing transportation – making it safer, increasingly accessible, and more reliable and efficient than ever before. Its flagship product, the Aurora Driver, is a platform that brings together software, hardware, and data services, to autonomously operate passenger vehicles, light commercial vehicles, and heavy-duty trucks.GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
GoodRx Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, offers information and tools that enable consumers to compare prices and save on their prescription drug purchases in the United States. The company operates a price comparison platform that provides consumers with curated, geographically relevant prescription pricing and access to negotiated prices through GoodRx codes that are used to save money on prescriptions across the United States.Asana
Asana helps teams orchestrate their work, from small projects to strategic initiatives. Headquartered in San Francisco, CA, Asana has more than 119,000 paying customers and millions of free organizations across 190 countries. Global customers such as Amazon, Japan Airlines, Sky, and Affirm rely on Asana to manage everything from company objectives to digital transformation to product launches and marketing campaigns.Wayfair
Netflix is lowering video bitrates in Europe because of coronavirus
Netflix will temporarily lower its streaming quality in Europe, after concerns that the video service might be putting too much stress on broadband infrastructure. On-demand services have proved to be a welcome distraction for people forced to stay home during social distancing, in an attempt to curtail the community spread of coronavirus.
At the same time, though, Netflix’s traffic has presented a not-inconsiderable challenge to infrastructure. As demands for higher-quality video have increased, in tandem with faster home internet connections and more affordable 4K TVs, the proportion of online traffic Netflix makes has risen too.
That might not be an issue at normal times, but having a far greater number of people at home during the COVID-19 pandemic has put greater strain on the system. At the same time, workers suddenly unable to go into the office and instead working from home are using video conferencing systems more frequently. Something had to give, and it seems that will be Netflix’s higher bitrates.
For the next 30 days, Netflix says, it will be reducing its streaming bitrate across Europe. “We estimate that this will reduce Netflix traffic on European networks by around 25 percent while also ensuring a good quality service for our members,” the company told SlashGear in a statement.
The decision comes after Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for internal market, confirmed he had spoken with Netflix CEO Reed Hastings about the potential impact of streaming. “Teleworking & streaming help a lot but infrastructures might be in strain,” the commissioner explained on Twitter. “To secure Internet access for all, let’s #SwitchToStandard definition when HD is not necessary.”
Important phone conversation with @ReedHastings, CEO of @Netflix
To beat #COVID19, we #StayAtHome
Teleworking & streaming help a lot but infrastructures might be in strain.
To secure Internet access for all, let’s #SwitchToStandard definition when HD is not necessary.
— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) March 18, 2023
Netflix uses a purpose-built content delivery network (CDN), dubbed Netflix Open Connect. These are effectively localized stores for Netflix data, appliances the company provides to ISPs that are focused on delivering streaming shows and movies in the most efficient way possible.
Back in 2023, the company said that almost 95-percent of its global traffic is delivered via direct connections between Open Connect and residential ISPs. “Most of these connections are localized to the regional point of interconnection geographically closest to the member watching,” Netflix said at the time.
Even with the changes Netflix is making to its streaming bitrates, what you might see in terms of a difference in picture quality isn’t easy to quantify. After all, that depends on a variety of factors – network congestion, the devices you’re using to stream, and your individual ISP, among other things – so some people may notice a slight change and others will not. If you’re paying for a 4K tier you’ll still get a 4K stream, however; it just might be at a lower bitrate than previously.
Right now there’s no current talk of potential changes for Netflix’s streaming bitrates in the US.
Oracle on Friday gave arch-rival SAP another reason for concern, making a $6.7 billion bid for embattled middleware software provider BEA Systems.
There’s a very real possibility the bid may turn into a protracted hostile takeover, however. BEA’s board of directors flatly rejected Oracle’s $17-a-share offer, claiming the “unsolicited proposal significantly undervalues BEA Systems.”
“BEA is worth substantially more to Oracle, to others and, importantly to our shareholders than the price indicated,” William Klein, BEA’s vice president of business planning and development, wrote in a rejection letter to Oracle President Charles Phillips made public later on Friday.
While Oracle has a proven track record of not taking “no” for an answer, BEA’s rejection, might be seen as opening the door for other suitors to join the fray, including SAP, IBM, HP or even a consortium of Chinese venture capitalists.
For Oracle, a completed deal would mean it would join IBM as a premier provider of middleware software used for service-oriented architectures (SOA) (define) in the enterprise.
But analysts on Friday said Oracle’s $17-a-share, all-cash offer is less about interest in BEA Systems’ product line than it is a reflection of Oracle’s unwavering commitment to overtake competitor SAP in the enterprise application market.
“Oracle is not buying technology with this deal,” Yefim Natis, a vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner, said in an interview with chúng tôi “They have a large degree of overlap with BEA. What Oracle is buying is penetration into the middleware market and a significant amount of market share. They made this aggressive offer now to prevent someone else from jumping in. Now Oracle will become one of the two dominant players in the middleware space.”
During the past three years, Oracle has spent more than $25 billion to acquire 30-plus software companies.
Though it had its eyes on BEA for years, the company finally pounced only after billionaire investor Carl Icahn last month increased his stake in the company to more than 13 percent of its outstanding shares. Icahn’s move aimed to prompt BEA executives into selling the company to prospective buyers.
The news comes as SAP has begun to show interest in changing its strategy to better compete with Oracle.
The $6.7 billion offer represents a 25 percent premium above BEA’s Thursday closing price of $13.62 a share.
“We have made a serious proposal including a substantial premium for BEA,” Oracle President Charles Phillips said in a statement announcing the offer, which it said it presented to BEA executives on Tuesday. “The proposal is a culmination of repeated conversations with BEA’s management over the last several years. We look forward to completing a friendly transaction as soon as possible.”
Not surprisingly, BEA Systems’ stock price skyrocketed following the announcement — at press time, up $4.53 a share, or 33 percent, to $18.15 a share. Since it’s trading above Oracle’s offer of $17 per share, some investors may believe SAP, IBM, HP or another dark horse suitor will make a counteroffer in the near future.
“We would not be surprised to see BEA become the object of a bidding war with potentially SAP and IBM being interested in the company, albeit for different reasons,” Cowen & Co. analyst Peter Goldmacher wrote in research note following the announcement. “We believe the recent and public bid by Oracle was inspired by SAP’s recent transition from an organic- to an acquisition-based growth company…It appears SAP is catching on to the benefits of Oracle’s…strategy and Oracle’s decision to buy BEA could be viewed as a defensive move to ensure that SAP doesn’t get a foot in the door in the M&A game.”
“It’s in the best interest of everyone involved for this to be a friendly and quick transaction,” Gartner’s Natis said. “Right now, this offer freezes the market for BEA. Who is going to buy anything from them right now? BEA needs to report their quarterly revenue and restore its ability to sell.”
Oracle shares inched up 2 cents to $22.48 a share in early-afternoon trading.
Another independent middleware software vendor, Tibco Software, saw its shares climb to $8.62, up 87 cents a share or 11 percent, on speculation that it too could become an acquisition target for top-tier software vendor.
This article was first published on chúng tôi
Android has become the de-facto operating system for smartphones, IoT devices, cars, TVs, and other electronic devices. The open-source project is being deployed almost everywhere because of the vast app support, lightweight profile, compatibility with a variety of hardware, huge developer support, etc. Apple’s iOS is putting up a good fight, but it’s nowhere close to Android’s dominance. In such a scenario, there is almost no competition and we are on the verge of an Android monopoly in the market. Such a situation is not good for innovation and competition. So to find out potential alternatives to Android, we have compiled this article with the best Android alternative. We have compared privacy, security, features set, and a lot more in this article. On that note, let’s go ahead and find out the top 12 Android alternatives.
Here, we have listed the 12 best Android alternatives along with an explainer on why we need an Android alternative. You can expand the table below and move to any section you want.Why We Need Android Alternative?
With around 72% market share, Android has become a monopoly in the mobile operating system market. There is not much choice for consumers, except to choose an Android device or go for the pricier iPhone. In such a scenario, we need more alternatives to accelerate innovation, bring more choices to consumers, add better privacy standards, and more. For the past many years, Android’s security has been lackluster. After Android 8, Google got serious about hardening the security of Android and closing the loopholes. In fact, in earlier Android days, there was no concept of runtime permission.
Currently, Android is on a course-correction phase where it’s bringing much-needed security features and privacy controls. Apple is forcing Google to bring privacy insights of apps, restricting apps from accessing clipboards, permission reminders, and so on. These are essential privacy features that are available on other mobile platforms for many years. Even today, we don’t have a user-facing network permission toggle on Android. Third-party apps can regularly scan all your installed apps, access your clipboard, and so on.Best Android Alternative Mobile Operating Systems 1. iOS
Not to mention, iOS is much more respectful of your privacy in comparison to Android. Recently, Apple added privacy report to the App Store where it displays all the user data the app is trying to collect. It also lets you request apps to disable tracking which is a great privacy feature to have. iOS is also simpler to use, although Google is working on Android to make it more accessible to a varied group of users. To sum up, if you want peace of mind with top-notch privacy and security, along with a legion of handy iOS features, Apple’s iOS positions itself as a suitable alternative to Android.
ProsConsBeautiful UI, Smooth operation, easier to useNot open-sourceMuch longer updatesDevices are costlyGreat quality of appsLimited customization
Visit Website2. GrapheneOS
If security and privacy are your main reasons behind your search for an Android alternative, GrapheneOS fits the bill perfectly. It’s a security-hardened operating system, built with top-notch privacy protection in mind. GrapheneOS, earlier known as CopperheadOS, is also developed on Android, but the main developer, Daniel Micay has worked extensively to make GrapheneOS a completely secure mobile operating system. Even Edward Snowden endorsed GrapheneOS and said that “If I were configuring a smartphone today, I’d use Daniel Micay’s GrapheneOS as the base operating system“.
Other than that, GrapheneOS ships with a hardened variant of Chromium called Vanadium for browsing the web, there is a security-focused PDF viewer, a secure camera app, Seedvault for encrypted backup, and a lot more. Not to mention, it does not ship with Google Play Services or microG, making it a completely deGoogled Android fork. All in all, if you are looking for a secure alternative to Android, GrapheneOS would be my top recommendation.
ProsConsTop-notch security and privacy protectionLimited device supportBased on AndroidFirst-party apps available
Visit Website3. KaiOS
For feature phones, KaiOS is a great alternative to Android. We know that Android has become quite heavy at this point. So to bring a lightweight mobile operating system to the masses, KaiOS serves the purpose really well without missing out on major features. It’s a Linux-based OS, forked from the discontinued Firefox OS, and can run on devices with just 256MB of RAM.
KaiOS packs its own KaiStore where you can find over 500 apps which include WhatsApp, YouTube, Facebook, Google Assistant, Google Maps, Google app, UC Browser, lightweight games, and more. There are hundreds of models available around the globe and the starting price of these phones is just $10 which is amazing. In India, JioPhone is quite popular which costs around $20-25 and runs KaiOS. To sum up, KaiOS is a perfect alternative to Android in regions where affordability is preferred over a long list of features.
ProsConsLightweight OS, a forked version of Firefox OSNot for the main Android smartphone marketSupports Web-based appsContinually updated4. Sailfish OS
Sailfish OS has been one of the oldest alternatives to Android, competing and developing a mobile operating system since 2013. It is currently in its 4th generation and is being actively developed by a Finnish company Jolla Ltd. Sailfish OS has been built on top of Linux along with many other open-source projects. While it’s not built on Android, Sailfish OS can run Android apps using its dedicated App Support solution. And that’s one of the selling points of Sailfish OS.
In Sailfish OS, user data is fully encrypted by its sandboxing solution called Firejail. All the connectivity and traffic runs behind a firewall with support for VPN. In terms of security, Sailfish OS is quite good and the company is making an investment to make it even more secure. Apart from all that, Sailfish OS has a distinct visual style and the gesture-based apps are fun to use. You can try Sailfish OS on Sony Xperia phones and Gemini PDA.
ProsConsThe visual style is quite good, gesture navigationA bit buggyCan run Android apps via a layerNot as performant as AndroidBuilt-in VPN and sandboxing
Visit Website5. Plasma Mobile / postmarketOS
Unlike many other Android forks, Plasma Mobile is an Android alternative that runs on top of a Linux distribution. It has been developed using the multi-platform toolkit Qt and KDE framework that powers so many Linux distros out there. To make the skin look fluid and mobile, it uses a Plasma Shell that feels polished out of the box. Note that, it does not run Android apps, instead uses the Kirigami UI framework to create apps for Plasma Mobile. Using Plasma Mobile, many Linux distros for phones have been released, but the most popular one is postmarketOS.
ProsConsLinux-based OSNo Android appsDeveloped Mobile shell using new frameworksFirst-party apps available
Visit Website (Plasma Mobile / postmarketOS)6. Ubuntu Touch
Ubuntu Touch is another Linux-based alternative to Android that is focused on bringing trust and privacy to smartphones. As the project is open-source, it has a huge community of developers and users who want to test, experiment, and contribute to the project. Ubuntu Touch feels and looks very identical to the Ubuntu desktop OS, however, it has been heavily optimized for touchscreen operations.
The UBports community also claims that none of your data leaves your device unless you explicitly allow it which is a good thing from the privacy point of view. Currently, Ubuntu Touch supports PinePhone, PineTab, Fairphone, Volla, Nexus 5, and OnePlus One. There are also 81 devices that are community supported so in terms of device support, Ubuntu Touch excels. Not to mention, you get all the necessary apps including the Camera app, Music, Gallery, Terminal, Clock, Dialer, etc. I would say if you want to try an open-source OS similar to Android, do give a look at Ubuntu Touch.
ProsConsOpen-source operating system, based on LinuxCannot match the third-party app support of AndroidComes with all the basic appsCan function as a desktop
Visit Website7. Mobian
Needless to say, it does not support Android apps and the app support is limited. However, Mobian sets out to bring an alternative mobile OS to Android which is quite nice. Mobian uses Phosh, a mobile shell built by Purism, and deploys well-known frameworks like Gnome and GTK. All in all, I would say, Mobian is a potential alternative to Android and you can definitely give it a try.
ProsConsMobile derivative from DebianLimited app supportPopular device supportBuilt on Phosh, Gnome, and GTK
Visit Website8. Tizen OS
If you are looking for an alternative to Android for larger screens such as TVs then Tizen OS is a better choice. Developed by Samsung, Tizen OS was aimed to run on all Samsung devices, be it smartphones, wearables, IoT devices, TVs, etc. However, fast forward now, and we are noticing Samsung is embracing Android for all its products except for the TV segment. Samsung has stopped developing phones with Tizen OS and recently, on Galaxy Watch 4, it moved to Wear OS from Tizen OS.
Having said all of that, for smart TVs, Samsung continues to use its Tizen OS as the project has gotten popular and lots of third-party apps have been launched including Netflix, Prime Video, etc. We have detailed a dedicated comparison between Android TV and Tizen OS so go through our article to learn more about the differences. To make it clear, as far as smart TVs are concerned, Tizen OS rules the roost and is more performant than Android TV, even on low-end hardware.
ProsConsGreat HTML5 supportThird-party app support is limitedBetter performance than Android TVBest for the TV ecosystem9. CalyxOS
CalyxOS is another privacy-focused alternative to Android which is completely deGoogled and puts a major focus on hardening security and privacy. It has been built by the Calyx Institute which is a New York-based nonprofit organization to make digital security more accessible to the masses. CalyxOS currently supports a handful of Pixel and OnePlus devices and Xiaomi Mi A2, but support for more devices will be added soon.
It ships with Signal for encrypted messaging; Tor browser to access the web without any tracking; a free and trusted VPN from the Calyx Institute; the open-source Aurora Store, a Play Store alternative, and more. There are no Google services included in CalyxOS but if you want, you can sideload microG to get some of the Google services without sacrificing your anonymity. To sum up, if privacy is what you are looking for on your smartphone, CalyxOS is a great alternative to other Android forks.
ProsConsPrivacy-centric OS, Based on AndroidLimited device supportMany security features include VPN, Tor, chúng tôi Google Services
Visit Website10. LineageOS
If your Android smartphone has hit end-of-life and no longer receives OTA updates from the manufacturer, LineageOS will come to your rescue. It’s a custom Android ROM, not much different from the standard Android that you are running on your device, however, you get to taste the latest Android version, even when the manufacturer is no longer supporting your device.
ProsConsBased on Android AOSP, Supports Android 12None as suchSupports a long list of devicesStable and Usable
Visit Website11. /e/ OS
After GrapheneOS and CalyxOS, if you want another alternative to Android that is highly secure and private then you can try /e/ OS. It’s also based on Android (LineageOS), but the operating system has been completely deGoogled and there are alternative apps in place of popular Google apps. You can install apps from its own store and it even displays privacy and energy ratings, similar to iOS’ AppStore.
/e/ OS is completely open-source and has been developed by the non-profit /e/ Foundation which is based in France. Currently, it supports more than 240 smartphone models which include popular Samsung phones and some Fairphone models. You can also buy smartphones preloaded with /e/ OS from its website. Overall, /e/ OS is a great solution for users who are looking to buy a privacy-focused smartphone but without Google lurking from behind.
ProsConsdeGoogle Android fork, based on LineageOS/e/ preloaded smartphones are a bit expensiveVast device supportPrivacy rating in app store
Visit Website12. HarmonyOS
It also comes with its own AppGallery where you can find thousands of popular Android apps. The company has also developed its own compiler called ARK in place of Android’s ART (Android Runtime). And the new EROFS file system is said to be better than EXT4 and F2FS. While HarmonyOS is deep inside an Android OS, chances are that Huawei will come up with an alternative to Android in upcoming years. The company is due to release HarmonyOS 3.0 in September with new APIs and SDK.
ProsConsSupports APK sideloadingThe core is still Android, uses the AOSP baseSuitable OS for Huawei ecosystemDeveloped its own APP package manager
Visit WebsiteWhat Do You Think of These Android Alternative Operating Systems?
Update the detailed information about Openai Raises Concerns Over Eu’s Ai Regulations, Threatens To Cease Operating In Europe on the Kientrucdochoi.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!