Trending December 2023 # Oracle Raises Stakes With Bea Offer # Suggested January 2024 # Top 16 Popular

You are reading the article Oracle Raises Stakes With Bea Offer updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Oracle Raises Stakes With Bea Offer

Oracle on Friday gave arch-rival SAP another reason for concern, making a $6.7 billion bid for embattled middleware software provider BEA Systems.

There’s a very real possibility the bid may turn into a protracted hostile takeover, however. BEA’s board of directors flatly rejected Oracle’s $17-a-share offer, claiming the “unsolicited proposal significantly undervalues BEA Systems.”

“BEA is worth substantially more to Oracle, to others and, importantly to our shareholders than the price indicated,” William Klein, BEA’s vice president of business planning and development, wrote in a rejection letter to Oracle President Charles Phillips made public later on Friday.

While Oracle has a proven track record of not taking “no” for an answer, BEA’s rejection, might be seen as opening the door for other suitors to join the fray, including SAP, IBM, HP or even a consortium of Chinese venture capitalists.

For Oracle, a completed deal would mean it would join IBM as a premier provider of middleware software used for service-oriented architectures (SOA) (define) in the enterprise.

But analysts on Friday said Oracle’s $17-a-share, all-cash offer is less about interest in BEA Systems’ product line than it is a reflection of Oracle’s unwavering commitment to overtake competitor SAP in the enterprise application market.

“Oracle is not buying technology with this deal,” Yefim Natis, a vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner, said in an interview with chúng tôi “They have a large degree of overlap with BEA. What Oracle is buying is penetration into the middleware market and a significant amount of market share. They made this aggressive offer now to prevent someone else from jumping in. Now Oracle will become one of the two dominant players in the middleware space.”

During the past three years, Oracle has spent more than $25 billion to acquire 30-plus software companies.

Though it had its eyes on BEA for years, the company finally pounced only after billionaire investor Carl Icahn last month increased his stake in the company to more than 13 percent of its outstanding shares. Icahn’s move aimed to prompt BEA executives into selling the company to prospective buyers.

The news comes as SAP has begun to show interest in changing its strategy to better compete with Oracle.

The $6.7 billion offer represents a 25 percent premium above BEA’s Thursday closing price of $13.62 a share.

“We have made a serious proposal including a substantial premium for BEA,” Oracle President Charles Phillips said in a statement announcing the offer, which it said it presented to BEA executives on Tuesday. “The proposal is a culmination of repeated conversations with BEA’s management over the last several years. We look forward to completing a friendly transaction as soon as possible.”

Not surprisingly, BEA Systems’ stock price skyrocketed following the announcement — at press time, up $4.53 a share, or 33 percent, to $18.15 a share. Since it’s trading above Oracle’s offer of $17 per share, some investors may believe SAP, IBM, HP or another dark horse suitor will make a counteroffer in the near future.

“We would not be surprised to see BEA become the object of a bidding war with potentially SAP and IBM being interested in the company, albeit for different reasons,” Cowen & Co. analyst Peter Goldmacher wrote in research note following the announcement. “We believe the recent and public bid by Oracle was inspired by SAP’s recent transition from an organic- to an acquisition-based growth company…It appears SAP is catching on to the benefits of Oracle’s…strategy and Oracle’s decision to buy BEA could be viewed as a defensive move to ensure that SAP doesn’t get a foot in the door in the M&A game.”

“It’s in the best interest of everyone involved for this to be a friendly and quick transaction,” Gartner’s Natis said. “Right now, this offer freezes the market for BEA. Who is going to buy anything from them right now? BEA needs to report their quarterly revenue and restore its ability to sell.”

Oracle shares inched up 2 cents to $22.48 a share in early-afternoon trading.

Another independent middleware software vendor, Tibco Software, saw its shares climb to $8.62, up 87 cents a share or 11 percent, on speculation that it too could become an acquisition target for top-tier software vendor.

This article was first published on chúng tôi

You're reading Oracle Raises Stakes With Bea Offer

Review: Ekster Smart Wallets Offer Siri And Great Storage With Sleek Designs

Ekster wasn’t on my radar until just about a month ago when I got to test out the company’s smart wallets and I’ve found myself very impressed with the design, build quality, and functionality of the offerings. Read on for our full review of Ekster’s smart wallets and what sets them apart from the rest of the market. And, yep, the company is also doing a Black Friday promotion with a 40% off deal.

Materials and build quality

Ekster uses full-grain premium bull leather for all of its wallets. The company also uses a two-toned finish on its leathers “giving them a distinctive look and color that will endure as the wallet softens, bends and forms to the way it is used, whether in pocket, purse or hand.”

I tested out the Vachetta Parliament in Brescia Bronze and the Secretary Cardholder in Nappa Black. From the first time picking up the wallets, the attention to detail and premium construction and craftsmanship is immediately apparent.

As for the quick access mechanism in the Parliament wallets and Senate cardholders, it uses a clever mechanical trigger to pop the cards up (no batteries). As for how it keeps up to 6 cards secure without falling out, there is a rubber strip on the inside edge that with little nubs that creates a snug fit for your cards.

Ekster offers a one-year warranty on its products along with a 14-day return policy for a full refund or 60-days refund period for store credit.

Chipolo solar-powered tracker card

A really thoughtful touch to make its wallets smart is integration with Chipolo tracker cards. But taking things a step further, the Ekster/Chipolo tracking cards recharge via solar. It’s roughly the thickness of two cards and can slide into any card slot.

Three hours of solar charging offers up to 2 months of use.

Ekster/Chipolo tracker card in the back slot of the Vachetta Parliament wallet

The Chipolo tracker card is the secret sauce that brings Siri/Siri Shortcuts functionality for keeping track of your wallet. The Chipolo iOS app is well done and you can even use the button on the tracker card to ping your iPhone or snap pictures as a remote shutter button.

In use

The Parliament wallets pack so much storage and functionality into a wallet that’s just about 0.5-inch thick. So that paired with the soft, high-quality leather makes them a joy to use day in and day out.

So you’ve got the cardholder portion with room for 6 cards and the fantastic quick access mechanism, then on the inside, there are two more slots on the left-hand side. Also on the inside on top of the cardholder on the right, there’s a handy elastic strap to keep cash and other small items like coupons, etc. Finally, the back of the Parliament has another card slot/pocket.

Other aspects I really appreciate include the slim design but there always being room for a random receipt, cash, or other small items. And all of that can be stored without a bulky wallet.

For times when you’d like to keep things even slimmer, the Secretary Cardholder is a perfect choice, it offers four card slots and a center pocket/card slot for cash or other items. You can also keep the Chipolo tracker card in any of the slots.

Vachetta Parliament in Brescia Bronze on the left, Secretary Cardholder in Nappa Black on the right

Ekster also offers iPhone wallet cases and a few other related accessories like money clips.


I honestly can’t think of any constructive criticism or ideas for how Ekster could make these products better. They’re really fantastic wallets and I highly recommend them.

I think for what you’re getting, they’re competitively priced but at the time of writing, Ekster is doing 40% off its wallets with the code “BF-40” at checkout making them an even more compelling value.

The Secretary Cardholder normally goes for $39, with the Parliament wallet starts from $79. The Chipolo solar-powered tracker card typically sells for $49.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Oracle Netsuite Crm Review 2023

Did You Know?

There is a $500 charge for an accounting cleanup and onboarding for the first month. After that, you’ll be charged monthly based on your average monthly expenses over three consecutive months.


If you have a large company, consider pushing for certification training for a few key internal users and administrators to ensure your team has the knowledge and skills to maximize your NetSuite investment.

Key Takeaway

NetSuite ensures your sales representatives and customers are able to find the right product quickly and easily.

NetSuite CRM Pricing

Unlike the vast majority of sales CRM software providers, NetSuite does not have publicly listed pricing or a variety of monthly plans separated by available features. NetSuite’s sales CRM software is considered an added module to the core platform that requires an annual license fee. The total cost for NetSuite with the CRM add-on is based on the number of account users. NetSuite also charges a one-time implementation fee to cover the cost of the initial setup. According to our research, small businesses can expect to pay well over $1,000 per month for the licensing fee, add-on modules and additional user fees. Prices will vary greatly based on the sales CRM features and additional tools you include in your Oracle NetSuite platform.


NetSuite requires a one-time implementation fee for the initial setup process. Because the setup for the CRM also requires NetSuite’s ERP, the full implementation process can take weeks, if not months, of planning, data migration, configuration, testing and training for your team to use the platform efficiently. In most cases, you’ll need to assign a reliable project manager to work with your NetSuite representatives to ensure a smooth implementation and launch. With so much time and effort involved, NetSuite’s CRM is best for companies that plan to commit to NetSuite as their main SaaS provider.

Customer Service

Any user can reach a NetSuite support specialist at any time from within the program via the help button. You can also contact a support specialist by phone or web chat at any time if you have your account information. However, NetSuite recommends customers use the online form or the company’s SuiteAnswers knowledge center for any how-to-related questions or technical issues.

For larger projects and custom integrations, you may want to consider reaching out to a certified NetSuite consultant or agency. NetSuite offers numerous product certifications for administrators, users, consultants and developers. The existence of these certification programs speaks to the complexity of the platform and its seemingly endless potential for customization in any industry. Many of the certification programs recommend at least one year of experience in managing NetSuite, in addition to coursework and a timed exam that consists of multiple choice and matching questions.


For small businesses in particular, the lack of transparent pricing and estimated high costs are among the biggest drawbacks of NetSuite’s CRM. To accurately compare NetSuite with competing software, you’ll have to speak with an Oracle sales representative about the many features and tools you’ll require, and they’ll give you a custom quote. For many small business owners who may not know exactly what they need from their CRM and related software services during the consideration stage, NetSuite can be a difficult sell.

Businesses that aren’t ready to adopt NetSuite for more than the basic CRM software will likely need to purchase NetSuite Connector as an added module to integrate with selling tools such as Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento, WooCommerce, Amazon, eBay and Walmart. While NetSuite does have a robust set of native cloud-based tools for nearly any business process, accessing them typically comes with an added monthly module fee.


We considered all of the major CRM software providers for review in 2023. After performing our initial research into each platform, we selected 13 of the leading CRM solutions available today for small businesses, including Salesforce, chúng tôi Sales CRM, Freshsales, Zoho, Oracle NetSuite, HubSpot, Pipedrive and Zendesk. After spending many hours participating in live product demos and testing each platform, we identified the best use case for each of the 13 providers to help small businesses owners and managers choose the best CRM for their needs. We also took a deeper dive into nine of our top performers, reviewing them in detail to provide greater insight into the features and tools that separate the best CRM software from the competition. At its core, NetSuite is an ERP platform with native integrations for nearly every business process required to support online sales. The e-commerce module lets you easily manage inventory, collect payments and fulfill orders fast for same-day shipping in some cases.

NetSuite CRM FAQ Are SAP and NetSuite the same?

No. SAP and NetSuite are separate business service providers that specialize in ERP solutions. The two companies have similar CRM modules that can be added to the core platform for an additional monthly fee.

Does Oracle own NetSuite?

Yes. Oracle announced its intention to purchase NetSuite for $9.3 billion in July 2023 in an effort to become a cloud software provider. The sale closed in November 2023, and NetSuite began operating as part of a global business unit within Oracle.

What’s the difference between Salesforce and NetSuite?

NetSuite is first and foremost an ERP software service with an optional CRM product that’s considered an added module. Salesforce is primarily a CRM software provider that offers additional tools to support ERP across industries.

Overall Value

We recommend NetSuite CRM for …

Enterprise-level organizations seeking a unified data solution to manage all customer-related activities.

Organizations that already use NetSuite’s ERP software.

Businesses with complex software integrations in niche industries.

We don’t recommend NetSuite CRM for … 

Small businesses that don’t want to adopt NetSuite as resource planning software.

Small businesses looking for a simple CRM platform.

Small businesses that need the most cost-effective CRM solution.

Oracle Products & Services Data Portfolio

Award-winning data services from Oracle have helped businesses of all kinds lift their data management capacities into the top tier.

Businesses face a number of problems when managing their data requirements: a lack of capacity, expertise, ability to extract raw data, and human bias/weaknesses in analytics.

Their data services can be found through the Oracle Cloud, which offers a host of computing features, including storage, database management, analytics, and more.

With more than 130,000 employees as well as data centers located around the world, Oracle is one of the most powerful names in enterprise data solutions.

Let’s review some of the core data products in its large portfolio:

See more: Microsoft Data Portfolio Review

Using Oracle Cloud, databases can be migrated from on-premises systems or any other location quickly and seamlessly. Automated tools can be used to find the most cost-effective form of migration, including an Oracle licensed product.

You’ll have high availability and complete control of the migration throughout the process. Their Maximum Availability Architecture and Zero Downtime Migration tools help ensure this happens in the smoothest and most efficient way possible.

Oracle Database aims to provide a solution to both long- and short-term data management challenges.

Developers will often want to get to work immediately and therefore choose a simple database. That app or project may produce a great deal of data that is useful for other projects. However, a basic database lacks the language and access to capture and repurpose it.

Oracle provides an option that works for single-purpose and longer-term goals.

Overall their database services offer market-leading performance scalability, security and reliability, whether in the cloud or on premises.

The current long-term release is Oracle Database 19C, which provides a high level of release stability and a long time frame for support and bug fixes.

21C is now available as an innovation release, which provides early insights and new capabilities, such as native blockchain tables and multi-workload support improvements.

It gives you a single database for all your needs and allows you to deploy it wherever and whenever you need.

Oracle estimates it can reduce operational expenses by up to 90% and provides a high level of security.

Data analytics is a crucial but often neglected aspect of data management.

Aside from the collection and storage of data, businesses need to be able to extract and gain insights that offer usability for people across the business. That means analytics capacity that is not only high performance, but also offers ease of use and accessibility.

Oracle’s augmented analytics make it possible to gain business intelligence (BI) and insights that help organizations grow.

See more: Data Analytics Market Review 2023

Traditionally, Oracle’s main targets have been the enterprises that want to harness their data to improve business operations.

Their services are used by businesses of all sizes, but the ability to access Oracle Cloud offers particular benefits to small-to-mid-sized businesses that can capitalize on high-powered data analytics without investing heavily in infrastructure.

A report by Oracle on the experience of users using the Oracle Analytics cloud, showed compelling results:


40% to 70% faster than legacy solutions


The introduction of Oracle Analytics delivered productivity improvements of between 25% and 55%

Deployment time:

Analytics enjoyed a three-fold reduction in deployment time


According to the report, customers saw costs fall by between

30% and 40%

The report highlights a number of business case studies, including one of a sales company that wanted to use analytics to drive stronger sales. Its key challenges were a need to understand results, deliver consistent sales performance, compare performance against competitors and bring in data from multiple sources into a single version.

They used Oracle analytics in the cloud to provide an analytics dashboard that helped them to understand customer renewals, produced a unified version of data for all stakeholders and delivered an 8% increase in early renewals.

Another report, run by IDC, found that Oracle Database produced a return on investment of 471% over five years with the initial investment paid back within five months. The report included interviews with organizations that have used Oracle to assess the value they gained. Among the benefits identified were:

Enabling more efficient and productive data analytics, application development and IT staff

Increasing the productivity of database administrators

Empowering organizations with greater agility, easier scalability and more robust stability to better support business units and increase revenue

Optimizing the use of resources to reduce the cost of operations and the IT infrastructure

Minimizing unplanned downtime to increase user productivity

Improving the productivity of business users and analytics teams

In general, customer reviews are positive. Users at G2 give Oracle Database four stars out of five, with most reviewers crediting it for streamlining their data as this reviewer says:

“Helped bring our 20+ different data sources into one manageable ‘data lake’. In addition, Oracle big data makes it easy to integrate our autonomous processes which we used for reports.”

The overall cloud infrastructure has an 80% satisfaction rating on TrustRadius, with users praising its speeds, customer service and security.

Oracle Analytics has a satisfaction rating of almost 90% at Gartner Peer Insights. Users praise its strong data visualization capacities and ability to put complete data analytics at your fingertips. 

Oracle’s data portfolio has achieved widespread industry recognition. Gartner named Oracle a visionary for its ability to execute the vision of Gartner’s “Magic Quadrant for Analytics and Business Intelligence” platforms.

In 2023, they won Ventana Research’s 13th-annual award for digital innovation for analytics for the Oracle Day by Day application, which delivers personalized analytics based on users interests and daily interactions. This app is part of the Oracle Analytics Cloud and offers users the benefit of AI-powered applications to improve the quality of insights.

See more: Top Cloud Service Providers & Companies of 2023

Enterprise Unix Roundup: Oracle, Enterprise Linux Pioneer?

They call it Unbreakable Linux, although if the rumors are true, Oracle may need to call it something else. Unbearable? Overbearing?

The reason behind the jibe? Well, it seems Marten Mickos, CEO at MySQL AB, has let it be known that one of his biggest competitors, the aforementioned Oracle, might be planning to pull an end-run and release and support the open-source MySQL database themselves — just like Oracle is doing with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Mickos doesn’t seem to concerned, and he’s a pretty unflappable guy. And while such an attempt tends to rub my sense of fair play the wrong way, the truth is that Oracle may be starting a trend that will ultimately be good for the enterprise … even if the company is doing it for purely selfish reasons.

Short term, MySQL isn’t worried about Oracle encroaching on its turf because the company believes that such a move from Oracle would only endorse MySQL. This is probably the case. When I got over my initial reaction of Oracle = Arrogant, though, it occurred to me that this kind of play will have long-term benefits as well.

The crux of the argument is simple: Someone should have thought of doing this before.

“This” means what Oracle is doing right now — taking pre-existing free/libre/open source software (FLOSS), changing it to something it can support, and releasing it as its own product — can be done simply because it’s FLOSS. There’s no rule that says you can’t do this. In fact, the rules encourage such sharing of innovation.

Under no circumstances should it be thought that Oracle is doing this out of any sense of altruism, and therein lies the rub. Oracle wants to knock Red Hat off the top of the enterprise Linux mountain — no ifs, ands, or buts. And, if Mickos is correct, it will want to do the same to MySQL. Even with selfish motivations, Oracle may have stumbled on the formula that only FLOSS allows.

One-stop shopping.

The idea that an enterprise customer should, in the near future, be able to go to one vendor and get an entire stack’s worth of products and support from that single vendor is something people have been aiming for for years. Even in the open source community, various Linux distributions have formed partnerships and alliances with other FLOSS vendors, to get their product offerings aligned.

Oracle, through sheer chutzpah, did them all one better: It reached out and took what it wanted. In other words, it out-FLOSSed the FLOSS companies.

This is because, up until Oracle, everyone wanted to play by the old rules. The ones where you made business deals and got permission to use code. Larry Ellison and crew figured out something that even the new FLOSS companies weren’t willing to: They don’t have to play by the old rules.

The old rules work for proprietary software. The new rules are where you take what code you need, build a product, and ship it (ideally with good support). What’s interesting is that Linux distribution companies have been doing this all along. A distribution is just a collection of many different FLOSS apps, all wrapped up in a neat package. When these distros were put together, there weren’t a lot of business deals. If a distro needed a text editor, it would just build packages for whatever editors it wanted: emacs, vi, gedit, kate … No one has a meeting or issues a press release when GNU GCC is included in a distribution.

Oracle seems to have figured out how to apply this take-what-you-need model to the stack — that catchy name for a collection of servers designed to interface the customer with the data in whatever particular manner the customer needs to interface. Instead of an application distribution, Oracle is building a stack distribution — without any “overhead” of a partnership arrangement.

What may be embarrassing for the FLOSS folks is they didn’t figure this out on their own. But before heaping too much praise on Oracle, there is something to be said for politeness and fair play.

Oracle may have made the next intuitive leap in the evolution of the software business, but it must also to be able to provide some really solid support to customers to make this work. They way it is building its stack distribution has precluded getting much help from the actual product sources. True, it has avoided the need to share revenue with any partners, but it has also burned a few bridges with the FLOSS community. This may prove key in the months to come.

Whether it turns out to be good or ill, however, Oracle may have started something big within the enterprise. Sooner or later, another vendor is going to figure out how to put stacks together without a lot of fuss and without ticking everyone else off. These kinds of integrated solutions will be a huge draw in the enterprise space.

More to the point, such customized solutions would be available only from FLOSS vendors, because only they can freely share their code. Such on-the-fly solutions would be impossible for proprietary vendors because of the sheer hassle of getting closed-source applications to efficiently work together — not to mention all the potential license headaches.

In its effort to dominate, Oracle may have paved the way for FLOSS to really succeed in the enterprise.

Brian Proffitt is managing editor of JupiterWeb’s Linux/Open Source channel, which includes Linux Today, LinuxPlanet, and AllLinuxDevices.

This article was first published on chúng tôi

Oracle Vs Google: Tech Pundits Weigh In

Oracle vs Google: tech pundits weigh in

There’s no lack of opinions out there this week on the long-coming case between Oracle and Google on who holds sway over the data they’re disputing, data used in Android that Oracle says is theirs. Where everyone seems to agree, it seems, is that this situation could be serious. Should Oracle be found in their own rights to get a piece of the Android action after Google’s been using code of theirs for the time Android has been live, Google could be in for a rather sizable chunk of payments coming up quick. If Oracle is found incorrect, on the other hand, Google will finally be free of accusations from one of their biggest looming legal threats.

Across the web we’ve heard tech voices speaking up on their take on the situation. Here on SlashGear, Chris Davies noted the first blows by Google in the case as being calling Oracle a Vampire, attacking Google now that their own smartphone ventures failed:

“Google pointed to three attempts by Sun – later acquired by Oracle – to build Java-based smartphone platforms. The company’s goal was “to build a mobile phone applications suite on top of JavaFx which will make Apple’s iPhone a direct competitor of ours,” according to an email from Oracle’s Larry Ellison to Sun’s Scott McNealy back in 2009. “We would then license the Java Phone software to carriers like Verizon” Ellison concludes.

That, perhaps unsurprisingly, fell flat; indeed, Google pointed out, Sun ended up giving the Java language to the public, and then Google built Android partially on top of it. The company even “publicly approved” that use, making this Oracle case laughable, the search giant claimed.” – Davies

Over at Boing Boing, Rob Beschizza quoted no less than Oracle CEO Larry Ellison speaking in the case at hand, saying the following appears to be “a gift to Google’s lawyers”:

“Do you understand that no one owns the Java programming language?” lead counsel Robert Van Nest asked. Ellison began a longer answer, but Judge William Alsup interrupted him and said it was a “yes or no” question. Finally Ellison said, “I’m not sure.”

“And anyone can use it without royalty?” Van Nest followed up.

“I’m not sure,” Ellison said again.

Then Van Nest showed a video of Ellison receiving the same question on a deposition video and answering “That’s correct” to both.

These quotes come from a Wired article by Caleb Garling where Oracle is “caught”, so to speak, several times on the opposite end of the argument they’re making now.

“Google’s lawyers seemingly found other situations where Ellison changed his tune, for example on the nature of an Oracle and Google co-development project for Java. And in a video from a JavaOne conference in 2009, after seeing an Android phone shaken at him while on stage, Ellison says, “We can see lots of Java coming from our friends at Google.” The idea apparently being to show that Ellison knew about and supported Google’s development of Java.” – Garling

Over at CNET, Larry Dignan spoke up on the situation with a simple two-sentence wrap-up:

“The takeaway here is clear. Oracle and Sun failed to monetize Java on the mobile front, and now Oracle is trying to use the courts to achieve what they couldn’t do in the marketplace.” – Dignan

At The Verge, Bryan Bishop speaks on the power of the case and, again, what it will mean for the tech world in the end:

“It’s a dramatic story from both parties, but no matter what the narrative, the case still seems to be one that comes down to simple matters of copyright. If the judge agrees that Java and other programming languages are protectable under current copyright law, and the jury finds that Google did indeed copy code, it’s unlikely that any number of intentions or motivations from the involved parties will factor into the end result.” – Bishop

Over at Ars Technica, Joe Mullin spoke on how Oracle welcomed Android when it was first initiated:

“Today Google responded … its lead lawyer, Robert Van Nest, gave a one-hour opening statement to the jury this morning. The Java APIs are free for all to use, just like the Java language itself, Van Nest told the jury—and Google built Android on its own, from scratch. When it was finished, Java’s creator, Sun Microsystems, wasn’t angry. It didn’t come demanding royalty payments. In fact, Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz congratulated Google publicly and welcomed Android.” – Mullin

Mister Caleb Garling spoke up today on one of the key questions and answers asked in the case thus far:

“When asked if he was aware of any companies today that are using Java without taking one of the platform’s three licenses, Ellison responded, ‘The only company I know about is Google.'” – Garling

Let us know what you think of the case thus far! Are you feeling that Oracle has a case, or that Google will win over with their open-source software in the end? Who owns the Java?

Update the detailed information about Oracle Raises Stakes With Bea Offer on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!