You are reading the article Targeting One Buyer–Or A Million updated in December 2023 on the website Kientrucdochoi.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Targeting One Buyer–Or A Million
The company:Based in Arlington, Va., chúng tôi is a content/e-commerce site focused on “the fun and finer things in life.”
Given these proclivities, chúng tôi execs assumed that high-end electronics gear like DVDs and home theater systems would be equally enticing. So in preparation for the 1999 holiday season, they loaded up on content and products in this category. But when the season came and went, the electronics merchandise didn’t. “While internally, the hypothesis was this was a good product line to get into, it turns out there was mild to low interest,” says Philip Hawken, director of operations at chúng tôi Inc., in Arlington, Va.
A warehouse of Web wares
WebSideStory Inc. Offers HitBox, a Web audience analysis service; chúng tôi a Webmaster resource center and community of independent Web sites; and chúng tôi a source of data on Internet user trends.
“With e-commerce, you need to be talking about a warehouse that’s customer-centric as opposed to traditional management information warehouses, which store information on the performance of a company and summarize it so people can see trends,” explains John McIntyre, director of global marketing at SAS Institute Inc., in Raleigh, N.C. “A customer-centric look is more likely to be augmented with external data. And to really personalize your relationship with customers, you need to take information from all points of contact that a company has with the customer to get the richest profile.”
SAS and many of the traditional data warehousing vendors, like Oracle Corp., see Webhousing as a natural extension of their product lines. For example, SAS is positioning its existing suite of tools, augmented by new additions, as a way for companies to produce reports, do analysis on their Web traffic, and develop rich customer profiles. SAS is also introducing what it calls Knowledge Solution add-ons to its Enterprise Miner datamining tool for specific functions like cross-selling, available since January 2000, and fraud detection and churn, which will be available in the first quarter of 2000.
Oracle also insists that Web business intelligence has to be part of an overall enterprise data warehouse effort to give companies a holistic view of their customers, according to Jagdish Mirani, senior director for Oracle’s Data Warehouse Program Office in Redwood Shores, Calif. The company’s Intelligent WebHouse, as it’s calling its end-to-end solution, comprises existing products, including Oracle Reports, the Darwin datamining tool, the Express multidimensional database, and the Discoverer, for ad hoc analysis. In March 2000, Oracle released Oracle Warehouse Builder, a lifecycle management tool for integrating data from enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, Web sites, and external data sources into a single warehouse.
Hawken acknowledges, however, that there’s much more work to be done to get a complete view of the customer. Later in 2000, chúng tôi plans to use extensions to net.Analysis to tie the Web log data to its catalog and shopper demographic information stored in its production SQL Server 7.0 databases. “We definitely want to extend the tool, but the data we’re getting out of the box is more than enough to make key business decisions before we get into more in-depth data Webhousing,” he explains.
Data warehousing meets the Web
Two data warehouse veterans have taken an early stab at defining and describing what they claim is the data warehouse reborn: the data Webhouse.
A custom approach
Ralph Kimball, a veteran data warehouse expert, is also a proponent of creating a real-time or what he calls a “hot response” cache as part of a Webhouse architecture (see diagram, “How to build a Webhouse”). “That way, the data warehouse can continually anticipate questions and provide a whole set of precomputed responses,” says Kimball, president of Ralph Kimball Associates Inc., in Boulder Creek, Calif., and co-author of The Data Webhouse Toolkit (see “Data warehousing meets the Web”).
Whatever the approach, smart Web businesses know that guesswork no longer cuts it when it comes to catering to customers. In today’s wild and wooly Web world, the name of the game is knowing exactly what customers want and when they want it. And that makes all the difference.
Many companies are still struggling with whipping enterprise data warehouse efforts into shape, and with the introduction of the Web, the exercise becomes far more daunting. Luckily, two data warehouse veterans have taken an early stab at defining and describing what they claim is the data warehouse reborn: the data Webhouse, a new entity at the center of the Web revolution.
As described by authors Ralph Kimball and Richard Merz in their book, The Data Webhouse Toolkit, published by John Wiley & Sons Inc., the new data Webhouse will be the engine that controls or analyzes the Web experience. As such, it increases the importance of the technology, but changes its very nature from the data warehouses of the past decade. In the book, written for designers and project managers in IT organizations, Kimball and Merz lay out the differences between the two generations, provide a detailed roadmap of how to design and model a data Webhouse, and discuss how to extend and adapt existing data warehouses to accommodate this critical Web component.
In keeping with its practical–rather than theoretical–tone, the authors devote Chapter 15 to the special management and organizational issues surrounding Webhouse projects. Included in this discussion is a nice organizational chart that spells out the roles necessary for getting a project of this ilk off the ground and completed successfully.
The authors acknowledge that the book tackles its subject matter at the very early stages of development. And yet while big changes are undoubtedly on the horizon, they make the case that the impact of the Web is so profound that Webhousing is the future for data warehousing. If they’re right, it’s not too early to get acquainted with one’s new environment, making The Data Webhouse Toolkit a worthwhile read. –Beth Stackpole
You're reading Targeting One Buyer–Or A Million
All In One SEO (AIOSEO) plugin, which has over three million active installations, is vulnerable to two Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
The vulnerabilities affect all versions of AIOSEO up to and including version 4.2.9.Stored Cross-Site Scripting
Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks are a form of injection exploit that involves malicious scripts executing in a user’s browser which then can lead to access to cookies, user sessions and even a site takeover.
The two most common forms of Cross-Site Scripting attacks are:
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting
Stored Cross-Site Scripting
A Stored XSS is when the malicious script is on the vulnerable site itself.
The vulnerability arises when there are insufficient security checks to block unwanted inputs.
The two issues affecting the AIOSEO plugin are both Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities.CVE-2023-0585
Vulnerabilities are assigned numbers to keep track of them. The first one was assigned, CVE-2023-0585.
This vulnerability arises from a failure to sanitize inputs. This means that insufficient filtering is done to prevent a hacker from uploading a malicious script.
The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) notice describes it like this:
“The All in One SEO Pack plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple parameters in versions up to, and including, 4.2.9 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping.
This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Administrator role or above to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.”
The vulnerability was assigned a threat level of 4.4 (out of ten), which is a medium level.
An attacker must first acquire administrator privileges or higher to perpetrate this attack.CVE-2023-0586
This attack is similar to the first one. The main difference is that an attacker needs to assume at least a contributor level of website access privilege.
A contributor level role has the ability to create content but not to publish it.
The vulnerability is also a medium level threat but it is assigned a higher vulnerability score of 6.4.
This is the description:
“The All in One SEO Pack plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple parameters in versions up to, and including, 4.2.9 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping.
This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor+ role to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.”Recommended Action
The first vulnerability requires administrator level privileges and is assigned a relatively low medium threat level score of 4.4.
But the second vulnerability only requires a lower level of privilege and is rated higher at 6.4.
It’s generally a good policy to update all vulnerable plugins. AIOSEO plugin version 4.3.0 is the one containing the security fix, referred to in the official AIOSEO changelog as additional “security hardening.”
Read details of the two vulnerabilities:
Featured image by Shutterstock/Bangun Stock Productions
TiTi protocol announces a successful fundraising round of $3.5 million, led by Spartan Group, with participation from SevenX Ventures, Incuba Alpha, DeFi Alliance, Agnostic Fund, Fourth Revolution Capital (4RCapital), Solidity Venture, and other institutions, as well as other individual investors including 0xb1 (Fold Finance), Tascha and Nipun (Alpha Venture DAO), and Michael (Fantom). The project was incubated by Alpha Venture DAO. With this latest funding, TiTi Protocol aims to work with world-class investors to build the future of DeFi.
TiTi Protocol is a fully decentralized, multi-asset reserve-backed, use-to-earn algorithmic stablecoin that aims to provide diversified and decentralized financial services based on the crypto-native stablecoin system and autonomous monetary policy. Its unique design brings a new paradigm of algorithmic stablecoin solution to decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 that combines the Multi-Assets-Reserve mechanism and the peg mechanism of the Reorders algorithm. By doing so, it aims to take over the torch of algorithmic stablecoins and bring a brand new solution to DeFi and Web3 ecology.
TiTi Protocol’s new use-to-earn token economic design will greatly boost algorithm stablecoin adoption and maximize the benefits for DeFi users, thus enabling the interoperability of algorithmic stablecoins with other DeFi projects. All this is only possible due to the research and experimentation of TiTi Protocol’s team in DeFi, especially the algorithm stablecoin track for several years. They believe that, in no time, TiTi will be able to write a glorious chapter in the Algorithmic Stablecoin track and the whole DeFi world.
Furthermore, the TiTi protocol is more than a stablecoin protocol, the stablecoin protocol is just the beginning. Its ultimate goal is to provide global users with diversified and DeFi services based on the crypto-native stablecoin system and autonomous monetary policy.
How is TiTi different compared with other algo stablecoins?
The very nature of Algorithmic stablecoins is to maintain a stable price by automatically adapting the stablecoin supply to meet demand. TiTi’s most unique feature is that it can improve algorithmic stablecoins’ liquidity and user adoption on the premise of ensuring stability. And all the keys to achieve all this are several core innovation modules of TiTi.
1. New stablecoin issuance paradigm, TiTi-AMMs, greatly boost stablecoin onchain liquidity, increase capital efficiency and free from impermanent loss. It is the module where TiUSD are issued and burned, controlling TiUSD inflation and deflation. It is impermanence loss free and has triple mining rewards, due to our unique liquidity rebalance algorithm. Stablecoin users need not to worry about their assets being liquidated. All they need to do is swap and swap back. Liquidity Providers don’t need to open a position for TiUSD when they would like to participate in liquidity mining. They just need to provide single sided liquidity to TiTi-AMMs, because the protocol will do the math and mint equal value of TiUSD for them, these TiUSD will be stored in the trading pairs enhancing the liquidity. That’s why we say TiTi-AMMs will boost TiUSD liquidity, because it greatly improves capital efficiency than the normal AMMs. It can effectively or suppress single-point risks, because no matter in the long-term or in the short-term, the stablecoin issued by the Protocol is always able to be guaranteed by the corresponding crypto assets with more than $1, and this data is completely on-chain, transparent and easy to gain users’ confidence. Because, the core stability mechanism allows users to exchange stablecoins with assets worth about $1. However, unlike the designs of Maker and Fei, it does so to allow all risk in the reserves to be dispersed. Stablecoin is not relying entirely on custodial stablecoins, and maintaining some resilience even as the value of the reserves fluctuates and flexibility to survive. The cherry on top is that it can break the upper limit of the issuance of native cryptocurrencies.
2. To begin with, it needs to be clear that TiTi Protocol is not a pure algorithmic stablecoin. It is more like a decentralized, multiple crypto assets backed, not collateralized, stablecoin whose supply and demand is adjusted by an algorithm. Unlike Ampleforth and YAM, who are purely controlled by algorithms and rely entirely on the stability mechanism of the Game Theory, which cannot be durable and bears great potential risks. Instead of just using algorithm, each and every TiUSD, the stablecoin issued by TiTi Protocol, is supported by sufficient crypto Assets in the reserve, such as WBTC, ETH, USDC etc. and supported by the continuous yields from Rainy Day Fund, the robustness of the protocol in dealing with the risks of market fluctuations in Reserve Assets has been improved, allowing the protocol to introduce Multi Crypto Assets as Reserves, so this Addresses two of the most important issues in the algo stablecoins race: stability and liquidity.
3. The Reorders can cohesively make TiUSD pegging to $1 via reshape liquidity pairs value. TiTi maintains price anchoring Dynamically and effectively adjusts the supply and demand of the primary and secondary markets of stablecoins through a new supply and demand algorithm，the Reorders. TiTi induces a peg coordination mechanism, which fosters high liquidity around the peg, while curtailing speculative attacks and bank run effects with Reorders and Rain Day Fund in case coordination breaks.
The cherry on top is that, another exciting function of the Orders is that the Reorders can curtail speculative and arbitrage from taking transaction slippage. Instead, the Reorder will proactively collect the slippage and distribute to Rain Day Fund and Protocol fee, thus benefit protocol users rather than speculators. Compared with the current stablecoin pegging mechanism, e.g. the Rebase, Reweight, the Reorders’ triggering conditions are more easily predictable and more precise. It can be triggered when 5% away from peg, or every 30 mins instead of 8hs, or 12hs, which are far too late to restore pegging and gain user confidence. Recapitalizing Multi-asset ReserveTiTi’s Multi-asset Reserve can be recapitalized or restored through Reorders. Because for each reorder, the slippage will be allocated to Rain Day Fund.
It seems that there is not much difference if users are using TiUSD or every other stablecoin & token as they usually do, trading, transferring, staking or asset hedge. However, if you dive in deep, you will know that TiUSD is actually an inherently interest-bearing algorithmic stablecoin. Because, TiUSD users or holders can claim extra rewards, the protocol fee, in a totally decentralized merkle proof way. At the same time, the technical architecture also guarantees the distribution of protocol fees can be adaptable to more complex incentive models, which also provides greater flexibility for TiTi Protocol’s organic growth and expansion.
For example, just like play-to-earn, the use-to-earn rewards can be distributed to users by , or targeted incentives to use TiUSD to an external transactions behaviors in the product, etc. The technical solution of Use-To-Earn is based on Merkle Proof to verify users’ reward distribution on chains. The off-chain part is responsible for the calculation of rewards according to how users are using TiUSD. The use-to-earn rewards algorithm and distribution pattern are mainly judged by how users’ using TiUSD in the crypto world. The use-to-earn algorithm and distribution pattern are designed and adopted based on the protocol’s organic growth in the early stage, and will be fully determined by TiTi DAO in the later stage.
5. TiTi Protocol have an Aligned DAO Governance governance mechanism that incentivizes the long-term health of the stablecoin for the few decades and beyond, rather than short-term profit.auctioning governance tokens or future reserve yields. Governance is incentivized to do this at opportune times as opposed to solely as last resorts in the middle of a crisis. If times are good, and governance token valuation is sky high, governors are incentivized to auction off new tokens early to boost the reserve.
About TiTi Protocol
TiTi Protocol aims to bring a new type of elastic supply algorithm stablecoin solution to DeFi and Web3 that incorporates the Multi-Asset Reserves mechanism. TiTi Protocol always monitors changes in the total value of reserve to calculate the average price of TiUSD in circulation and adjusts the market-making peg price of TiUSD in the primary market through the ReOrders mechanism.
Follow TiTi Protocol on Twitter.
Email: [email protected]
It’s frustrating when your AirPods or earphones aren’t working. And it’s even more frustrating when it just plays in one ear. Several people have faced this issue in the past and it got my attention right away! So why not fix this issue of your iPhone headphones or AirPods not working in one ear? Sounds good, right? So let’s get started.
Before we fix earbuds that work on one side of iPhone, make sure you’ve checked the same piece of earbuds or headphones on another device. If it works, then there might be some issues with your iPhone. And if it still works just with one ear, you need to follow the detailed troubleshooting tips given below.How to Fix AirPods or Headphones That Only Work on One Side of iPhone
Here are a few ways to get rid of headphones that only work on one side of your iPhone.Tip #1. Clean Your AirPods or Headphones
How often do you clean your AirPods or headphones which you use for regular calling or for playing music? I reckon, hardly once in a month, isn’t it?! It’s obvious that you don’t have much time to look into them. In such a situation, an AirPods case is your rescue partner without any doubts. It keeps them safe in a nutshell.
If not, remove the dirt, dust etc. with a controlled compressed air so that everything gets cleaned on your AirPods or headphones. This is a generic solution that might not work for all but it has proven that it worked for at least a few who faced this issue.Tip #2. Check the Audio Settings
Is your audio setting set to perfection? If not, you’re sure to face this issue. To make sure you’ve done the right thing, head over to Settings → Accessibility → Audio/Visual under Hearing and make sure that the Phone Noise Cancellation balance is right between L and R. Also, check that Mono Audio is turned off which is the main reason why you might face this problem.
Once done, save the settings and try to play some music on the earphones or AirPods you’re using. If it’s clear and loud, it’s obvious you had messed up with the audio settings some time in the past.Tip #3. Restart Your Device & Reconnect Your AirPods/Headphones
Restarting a device can help you fix a lot of other issues as well apart from sound playing in just one of the AirPods. Just restart the device on which you’re using your AirPods or headphones and see if it works for you.
Another thing is to disconnect your AirPods from the existing device and try to pair your AirPods again. Hopefully, this must solve the issue if there were any software issues in your AirPods or on your iDevice.Tip #4. Reset All Settings on iPhone/iPad
Of course, you might not want to lose all your iPhone’s or iPad’s settings but if you badly want to get your AirPods or headphones working, this must be on the cards. Go to Settings → General → Reset → Reset All Settings. This should reset all the settings on your iPhone/iPad. Now connect your earphones again once you reset the device.Tip #5. Use Another Pair of Headphones/AirPods
This is the only possible way to know whether your AirPods or headphones are at fault. If another pair of AirPods work fine with your iPhone/iPad, then the existing ones are at fault. In such cases, you need to consult an expert at Apple Store to get the issue checked!
That’s it, folks!
Suraj is an operations head on the iGB team. He contributes to the social media section along with tips and tricks for iPhone, Apple Watch. Apart from blogging, he likes to work out as much as he can in his gym and love to listening to retro music.
HTC One M9 vs. One M8 — should you upgrade?
Now that the HTC One M9 is official, you might be wondering if it’s time to upgrade. Sporting all the latest specs, like a Snapdragon 810 octa-core CPU and 3GB RAM, might make you wonder if it’s that much better than your current phone. A new 20-megapixel rear shooter and Ultrapixel front-facing camera are quite the pair, too. If oyu’ve got a One M8, you’re probably one of the many who love their phone, so rather than keep you guessing about whether an upgrade is worth it, we’ll break it down.
Before we get into any opinion, here are the hardline specs for each phone (One M9 in bold):
Display: 5-inch Full HD 1520 x 2688, 5-inch 1080 x 1920
SoC: Snapdragon 810 (octa-core, 4 x 2GHZ + 4 x 1.5GHz), Snapdragon 801 (quad-core, up to 2.3GHz)
RAM: 3GB, 2GB
Memory: 32GB, 16/32GB (both expandable via microSD card, supports up to 128GB)
Rear Camera: 20MP f/2.2 (27.8MP wide-angle), Dual camera 4MP f/2.0
Front Camera: UltraPixel, 5MP
Battery: 2840mAh, 2600mAh
That’s the core spec-sheet stuff. As you can see, the processor is a big uptick, and moving from quad-core to octa-core will help power users out quite a bit. For those who don’t use their phone for multi-tasking or heavier gaming, we doubt the difference will be noticeable.
The display change is going to make a big difference when you’re looking at pics or other media. Day-to-day, it likely won’t do much more than the One M8 did. Still, HTC did a good job, here — good enough to be noticeably different, at least.
The uptick in RAM is again great for power users. With a 64-bit octa-core processor, more RAM means more room to run. Memory is again a wash — 32GB and expandable is just fine by us. The battery size change is not going to bring in a ton of extra time with your handset, so it’s not a big deal.
The rear camera on the One M9 sounds wonderful on paper, but we’re going to wait for more hands-on time before we get into an opinion about it. 20MP versus 4MP sounds amazing, but the f/2.2 versus f/2.0 might make a difference, and we all know megapixels don’t tell the whole story. Going to a larger megapixel count in wide-angle is neat, though.
HTC’s front-facing camera will probably make video chatters and selfie-takers happy. What HTC has essentially done is taken the rear-facing cam of the One M8 and moved it to the front of the One M9. This is pretty special, as the One M8’s camera was more than adequate for casual shots, which is what selfies and video chats really are.
Intangibles abound, though. HTC has something called themes this time around, which add a layer of customization to your handset. Sense is also reworked a touch, which is subjective to taste. We like what HTC has done, but you might find it muddled. The aim is to be more contextual, and it’s an improvement on an already good Android overlay. Again, we’ll wait for more time with the new-look Sense.
So, should you upgrade? If you’re ready to, we’d say yes. Though an iterative upgrade, the One M9 is really good — HTC has done a nice job in upgrading a phone some thought was the best Android handset of 2014. The octa-core processor keeps up with even the most strenuous tasks we tossed its way, and 3GB RAM keeps it from thinking too hard. We’re not totally sold on the camera yet, but that just means we need more time with it.
On the flip-side, if you’re happy with your One M8, or aren’t in a position to upgrade, you won’t feel too left out. The One M9 is a really nice handset, but it doesn’t distance itself like HTC did when they went from the One M7 to the One M8. That was a substantial change — this isn’t as drastic. The One M9 is definitely a keeper, though.
Atheist or Agnostic, a Place for Humanists Two campus groups for students who doubt or disbelieve
Students in Humanists of Boston University cleaned the Esplanade recently in their ongoing community service. Photo by Frank Curran
John McCargar found religion fascinating by the time he was seven, an age when most children would sooner eat broccoli than attend church. “I was a strange kid,” he says with a laugh. Growing up, he sampled a number of religions—from Christianity to Deism—and by the time he got to BU, he was a Mormon. But studying further, he found evidence lacking for some of Mormonism’s religious claims, and disenchanted, gave up on religion. (That’s the short version; ask for the long version and this cerebral student talks about “Aristotelian critiques of Platonism” and “metaphysical constructs of reality.”)
“Losing my faith was a painful thing,” says McCargar (CAS’11), but liberating in its honesty.
McCargar now finds himself in a distinct minority: a secular humanist, an umbrella term for those who doubt or disbelieve in the existence of God. The nonprofit Pew Forum on Religion and American Life reports that just 5 percent of Americans identify as nonbelievers. Many atheists call themselves humanists because of the perceived baggage of the a-word. Whatever the term, on a campus steeped in Methodist history and dotted with worship services for all sorts of denominations, BU humanists now have two groups they can call home.
Founded three years ago, Boston University Atheists and Secular Humanists is “a social network as well as a venue for discussions and debates,” which means anyone of any view is welcome, says Miranda Bloom (CAS’12). Few religious believers accept the invitation, however. Because members “essentially agree on our beliefs,” Bloom says, “debates do not generally last long.”
McCargar was looking for something else: a humanist group that featured more dialogue with believers and more volunteer service as part of its mission. So he and friend Tim Martinez (CAS’11) started Humanists of Boston University two years ago. In addition to service projects, such as a recent Sunday cleanup of trash around Boston’s Esplanade, the group hosts discussions that, for mental calisthenics, rival a philosophy seminar. McCargar recently led two nights of discussion around the question of whether science is at all useful—as a moral yardstick to judge right from wrong, or even for explaining the physical universe—taking pro and con positions on different nights.
Not so, objected one student: “What we do have is useful, but it doesn’t mean it’s perfect. I do believe in black holes, but I don’t know what causes them.” Then she smilingly beseeched, “Somebody?” looking for backup from her peers. McCargar, a natural teacher with a supple, quick-on-his-feet intellect, obliged, offering what he said was a quote from the titular doctor of the TV drama House: “The inexplicted [sic] is not inexplicable.” The discussion ended with no consensus or votes. “There’s nothing that we’re trying to promote, necessarily,” McCargar explained. “It’s just sort of a thought experiment.”
The disparate approaches of the two BU groups partly reflect a broader division among American humanists. On one side, New Atheist writers like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris deride religion as dumb at best and dangerous at worst. Countering them are thinkers like Harvard humanist chaplain and author Greg Epstein, who argues that humanists can reject belief, but learn from believers.
Still, “I do believe there is plenty of potential” for Humanists of Boston University, he says. “It is a club dedicated to improving lives and bringing people together.”
However, public opinion suggests that many remain uncomfortable with the idea of humanism. Polling indicates Americans are more likely to vote for just about anyone—woman, gay person, Mormon—before they’d vote for an atheist. A University of Minnesota study suggests that the aversion stems from many believers’ equating disbelief in God with self-interest and indifference to the common good. BU is more welcoming, says Bloom, who recalls intolerance towards nonbelievers in the Boston Irish Catholic neighborhood where she grew up; here, she says, professors and peers don’t judge and condemn her.
“I do not believe that one has to be affiliated with an organized religion in order to make a positive difference or to discuss religion’s role in history and in the world,” she says. Indeed, according to a recent Pew survey, the American group most knowledgeable about religion was—atheists.
Rich Barlow can be reached at [email protected].
Explore Related Topics:
Update the detailed information about Targeting One Buyer–Or A Million on the Kientrucdochoi.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!