Trending December 2023 # Wikiasari : The Answer For Search? # Suggested January 2024 # Top 19 Popular

You are reading the article Wikiasari : The Answer For Search? updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Wikiasari : The Answer For Search?

Even as search becomes all-but-synonymous with the Internet for many users, there’s a paradoxical and growing sense that it’s failing. We have incredibly high expectations for search but that’s partly because it has been very successful to date. Every quarter or so it seems a new, would-be David comes out to challenge Googliath.

The newest one is Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales, who is planning to launch a Wiki-based search engine called “Wikiasari.” Here’s his public statement on the motivation for and foundations of the project:

“Search is part of the fundamental infrastructure of the Internet. And, it is currently broken.

Why is it broken? It is broken for the same reason that proprietary software is always broken: lack of freedom, lack of community, lack of accountability, lack of transparency. Here, we will change all that.

There have been some amazing projects in recent years which have matured now to the point that a new alternative is possible. Wikia is funding and supporting the development of something radically new.

Nutch and Lucene and some other projects now provide the background infrastructure that we need to generate a new kind of search engine, which relies on human intelligence to do what algorithms cannot. Just as Wikipedia revolutionized how we think about knowledge and the encyclopedia, we have a chance now to revolutionize how we think about search.

Help me out, spread the word. I am looking for people to continue the development of a wiki-inspired search engine. Specifically community members who would like to help build people-powered search results and developers to help us build an open-source alternative for web search.

Wikipedia is an amazing success story that nobody could or would have predicted. So maybe Wikiasari holds the same promise but my sense is that it will have to look and act quite different from Google or Yahoo! to gain usage, but at the same time be as simple to use.

Some would argue that Wikipedia has already “jumped the shark” in terms of expanding to cover trivia and celebritites.

You're reading Wikiasari : The Answer For Search?

Review: Is Chatology The Solution For Messages Search?

Messages for Mac is buggy. There’s no denying that fact. At some point, all of us have tried to search for a specific message in the app only to be confronted by everyone’s favorite multi-colored symbol of despair.

Several weeks ago, Flexibits, developers of Fantastical for Mac and iPhone, announced a new project called Chatology that would finally solve this issue once and for all. Today, they unveiled the app to the world. So what exactly is Chatology? Does it solve the problem it sets out to solve? Keep reading to get answers to those questions and more.

What is it?

The biggest question that most people had when Chatology was first teased was simple: what does the app actually do? Some assumed that it would be a full-blown messaging suite with improved search features. Others hypothesized that it would be some kind of tweak or plugin for Messages that solved the search problem right in the same app.

The real answer is somewhere in between those two. Chatology is a separate app, not a plugin. However, it doesn’t actually feature any messaging capability. You still have to use the Messages app to send or receive iMessages and IMs on other platforms.

Chatology also has the ability to integrate with Messages. When this option is enabled, pressing Command-F in the Messages app brings up Chatology instead of the usual Messages search bar. This feature is very handy if you frequently search your messages but prefer Chatology’s search interface over Apple’s.

Does it work?

Now that we know what Chatology does, let’s address how well it does that. For starters, the design of Chatology makes it somewhat impractical for anything other than searching. If you just want to read a series of messages from yesterday or a few days ago, you’re probably better off scrolling backwards in the Messages app.

Due to the way Chatology separates logs by date, if you don’t know the exact date of the message you’re looking for, it can quickly become a pain to find what you need.

Another factor that can cause some trouble searching Chatology is the sheer number of messages that it stores. Because Chatology stores all of your logs from the Messages app, all of your AIM or Yahoo! messages are also logged, along with those from any services you might use, such as the Amy plugin. In my case, all of my chúng tôi private messages, AIM conversations, and iMessages were imported. That’s a lot of conversations to go through. Even though Chatology searches through them all with no problem, narrowing down the results to the exact message you need can take some time because there’s no way to separate chat logs by the chat service that created them (this is OS X’s fault, not Chatology’s, however).

Yes, Chatology works, and works well. It searches all of the chat logs on your computer with incredible speed. It can separate group chats from individual chats and separate those individual chats by sender, although it currently doesn’t combine multiple addresses into one contact, like Messages for Mac does, so you’ll have multiple entries for the same person if you chat with them on different services or using different iMessage addresses.

What problem?

When Apple finally released OS X 10.8.4 after what seemed like an eternal beta process, the update included fixes for searching in Messages that left the app running smoothly for almost everyone.

This left Flexibits in an odd predicament. They had already positioned themselves as the incoming saviors of chat search, but now Apple had fixed the entire problem they set out to solve. They had been beaten to the punch.

The bottom line

The idea behind Chatology is great, but the execution is flawed. The interface, while simple and lightning fast, makes finding the right message difficult in many cases. The problem it was designed to mitigate no longer exists.

Users who need the ability to search for links or images within conversations will enjoy the ability to do so, but the need to select a specific time and date that the image or link in question was sent essentially negates the usefulness of the feature.

Unfortunately, I’m not sold enough on Chatology to recommend it to most users over the built-in search in Messages. Since the search issue has been resolved in OS X 10.8.4 (and Mavericks), I can’t see much of a need for a separate app to search chat logs, especially one that, in my opinion, makes searching no more efficient than it already is.

A free trial of Chatology is available on the Flexibits website, and the full version can be purchased on the Flexibits web store for $19.99.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Is Your Windows 11 Pc Encrypted? The Answer Is Surprisingly Complex

In fact, the mechanisms to do exactly that are already in place. Windows 11 Home and Windows 11 Pro both support automatic device encryption, with the Home version a more streamlined experience. You just have to sign into the machine with a Microsoft account, which nearly all people do during setup.

What trips up the process (and makes Windows 11 encryption so complicated) is your hardware. If a PC doesn’t meet the required standards, device encryption doesn’t automatically kick on, even if your laptop or desktop system is brand new. That doesn’t mean your computer can’t be encrypted, but you may have to do some work or pony up more cash to make it happen.

Note about “device encryption” vs “Device Encryption”: In this article, we use “device encryption” (lower case) as a general reference to secured data in both Windows Home and Pro. The official name for the feature in Windows 11 Home is Device Encryption; in Windows 11 Pro it’s called BitLocker Device Encryption.

How to check if your Windows 11 PC is encrypted

Open the Settings app. In the left-hand menu, choose Privacy & Security.

On PCs that don’t support device encryption, you won’t see anything related to the feature in the menu. (Why Microsoft doesn’t show a grayed-out option is anyone’s guess.)

My Windows 11 PC is not encrypted. What now?

Presumably, you’re reading this section because you can’t encrypt your PC—that is, Device Encryption settings are invisible to you in Windows 11 Home—and you’d like to. So first, you need a general idea of why your system didn’t automatically enable encryption. Then you can decide to troubleshoot further, spend some money, or call it a wash.

To read the full description of the problem, hover your cursor over the text in the “Value” column.


Depending on the reasons given, you may be able to fix the problem(s). A common one is a lack of support for Modern Standby—it’s a low-power state that allows a computer to run updates and other processes while asleep, as well as wake up instantly like a smartphone. Most current laptops support this feature, while many desktops don’t. Of those that do, a handful of PCs don’t have modern standby enabled by default, but you should be able to find tips online to help you flip it on.

Device encryption still won’t work after troubleshooting your roadblocks? You can upgrade to Windows 11 Pro. Shelling out $99 opens up access to BitLocker, which will work on systems without Modern Standby or even a TPM.

If you don’t want to spend any money, you can of course choose to go sans device encryption. (We don’t recommend it for security reasons, but it is an option.) You can also instead try a third-party encryption solution like VeraCrypt, which isn’t as seamless but costs nothing.

Why is encryption so complicated in Windows 11?

Given that modern smartphones pull off automatic device encryption seamlessly, Microsoft does surprise with this inconsistent application of the feature. But in fairness to Microsoft, PCs have a wider spread of possible configurations that Windows 11 could be installed on.

Fact of the matter is, if encryption is important to you (and for laptop owners, it should be), be prepared to check on your system’s status. You unfortunately can’t yet assume this area of security is covered out the gate.

Flash Tricks For Improved Search Engine Rankings

Flash Tricks for Improved Search Engine Rankings

Let’s first take a look at how search engine indexing can cause you problems on your web site.

Most web sites are built up of menus and context areas. The menus are frequently text based, making them easy to update or change. The content is dependent on our writing creativity. Both of these can lead to search engine indexing trouble.

Search Engines look through the text on your pages, menus as well as content and they create their index on what they find. So far so good. But just how do the search engines do this? They can’t look at your page and decide which is the main content area visually, so they simply start at the top of the code and work down.

If your site follows the standard pattern of a navigation bar on either the top or down the left side of the page and uses a table structure to achieve this, then your whole nav bar will be read and indexed before your main content area. If your site has a lot of variation then this shouldn’t be a problem. But what if your site is focused on one subject and your navigation bar tends to repeat words? As an example you may have a site that sells watches and your nav bar may read like this: Men’s Watches, Ladies Watches, Sport Watches, etc. You can see how easy it is to repeat that word Watches.

Search engines like to give points to sites that contain valuable content that is easily categorized and recognizable to visitors, but they also take away points for keyword spamming. In the above Watch example, the nav bar could easily cause your page to be listed as a keyword spammer.

Here is the first Flash Trick to improve your ranking. Create the navigation bar in Flash. This way all those repeating words are now hidden from the search engine spiders. As an added benefit the code taken up by the Flash will probably be less than the code used in the text based nav bar. This will help the search engine spiders to focus on the main content area of your page.

Let’s now look at another common problem with search engine indexing. In this example consider a shopping site selling the same watches as in our previous example. Each watch page will have a description of the individual watch, and that is fine. But each page may also have “boiler plate” text as well. There may possibly be a standard description for a particular watch brand, or possibly warranty or shipping information included on the page.

Another red flag that goes up for the search engine spiders is text repeating from page to page. The more distinct each page is the more likely the search engines will consider the text as relevant. If there is too much repeated text, the search engines may even drop all the pages that they believe have duplicated text. Not a good situation, especially if you don’t want to be forced into creating completely original text for every page on your site.

Here is Flash Trick number two. Keep all the distinct content on your pages as html text and convert any repeating text areas into Flash files that are placed into the pages. This way, only the distinct text is visible to the search engines and your repeating text is hidden in the Flash file. Any text that you tend to repeat from page to page is a prime candidate for the Flash treatment.

George Peirson is a successful Internet Trainer and is the author of over 30 multimedia based tutorial training titles covering such topics as Photoshop, Flash and Dreamweaver. To read his other articles and see his training sets visit HowToGurus.

Rules For Search Engine Journal Guest Contributors


Last updated September 2023

We regularly update this page. Here’s what you need to know about being an SEJ contributor:

How to Contribute to SEJ

Search Engine Journal contributors are invited by the editorial team only.

Search Engine Journal accepts contributions from professionals in SEO, digital marketing, social media, content marketing, ecommerce, and PPC.

Expert Contributors commit to a recurring publishing date either monthly, every other month, or quarterly. Ad hoc slots are granted on a case-by-case basis and these columns run when there is an opening on the editorial schedule.

Contributor Agreement

All contributors at SEJ are expected to digitally sign a basic contributor agreement before posts can be published.

Posts Must Be 100% Original to SEJ

Columns accepted for publication must be exclusive to Search Engine Journal and 100% original. This means:

No plagiarism! We use CopyScape and it is at the Executive Editor’s decision whether the offense warrants a warning or removal from the Contributing Experts roster.

No self-plagiarism: You can’t “borrow” sentences from your own prior published content, or from company blog posts (or other written materials). If you’re going to use someone else’s words/thoughts, it must be properly attributed.

Note: As of May 2023, we no longer accept syndicated posts.

What to Write About

There are two ways to claim a topic for your next submission:

Pitch the Managing Editor.

Choose an approved title from the list in our private Writers Group.

If you aren’t yet a member of this group, you’re on Facebook, and you’re contributing to Search Engine Journal, please let the Executive Editor know to add you!

The most successful articles tend to be:

Lists (e.g., examples, tips, tools, tactics).

How-to articles/guides.

Explainer posts (e.g., what is…/why x matters).

Expert roundups.

Thought leadership.

A solution to a problem.

Share your own experiences. Don’t rely heavily on quoting influencers, experts, or authorities from other sites.

Be the expert!

What Not to Write About

Search Engine Journal does not publish content pertaining to gambling, weapons and firearms, pornography, or other industries/topics that may violate Google’s content policies.

We do not publish examples of other marketing publications conducting their marketing activities. Try to find examples that are relatable to businesses and the agencies, consultants, and digital marketing/SEO professionals who assist them.

Posts Must Be Pitch Free

You aren’t writing to sell a product or recommend a particular product or service.

You’re writing to share your expertise, information, insights, and ideas with our audience.

Our audience of digital marketers can smell a sales pitch or gratuitous client mention a mile away.


If you have a relationship with a company or someone mentioned in your post, you must disclose it. Some examples of disclosures:

Citing original data/research from your company: “(Disclosure: I work for [insert company name here])”

“My case study features the Cleveland Zoo, a client of mine.”

“My business partner, Genevieve Focker, wrote the case study below.”

Post Length

How long should your post be?

Our minimum post length for Contributing Experts is 1,000 words.

Most posts that appear on Search Engine Journal are between 1,500 and 2,000 words.

If you want to write an in-depth post that is 3,000 words, 4,000 words, or even longer, please ask for approval from your Search Engine Journal Editor first!

Note: Longer posts tend to get more pageviews, time on page, and social love. However, they also burn you out a lot quicker. Remember, you could probably turn that monster post into 3 or 4 more targeted posts instead!

The best posts are clear, concise and only as long as they need to be. After all, our readers are busy. Tell them what they need to know and get out.


Try to be concise.

Always try to keep your paragraphs short.

One sentence is fine.

Two sentences is typically OK. But no more than three sentences. Please.

Short paragraphs are easier to understand and digest (particularly on mobile), help drive your point across, and encourage reading in this age of information overload and short attention spans.

SEO Best Practices

Let’s practice what we preach, folks.

Headline URL

You can edit your URLs (Permalink). Use this to highlight important keywords.


Captions are optional.

Always add Alternative Text. This can be the post title or a succinct description of the photo that fits the post’s topic.

Optimize your image file names. IMG_123454646572.png or chúng tôi is bad.

Yoast SEO

We love Yoast SEO. It will highlight potential SEO and readability problems and areas for improvement.

What you need to worry about for your post:

SEO Title: Make sure this matches your headline.

Slug: This is the same as your URL/Permalink.

Focus keyword: What search query do you want to rank for?

WordPress Categories

Pick, at minimum, one WordPress category for your article.

You may pick up to two relevant categories (e.g., if your post covers both SEO and Content Marketing).

Content Types

Typically, you will choose “Tutorials.”


Please add an excerpt (maximum: 25 words) for every post. It can be similar to your meta description.

This is the description that appears on the Search Engine Journal website when it publishes. If your excerpt exceeds 25 words, it will end with a …

A/B Testing of Titles

We A/B test headlines – your main headline and two alternates. Alternate headlines must be less than 70 characters.

In-Article Links

Links to third-party authoritative sources tell the reader that you are incorporating third-party perspectives and evidence in support of your argument. Otherwise, all you’ve got is a theory without substantiation.

Having said that, our editorial team is always on the lookout for links that appear promotional. We’re marketing to marketers, so if we don’t sleuth it out, our very savvy community eventually will.

Our editorial team looks for links to clients, friends, or appear self-serving in some way. In some cases, the promotion may be unintentional, but it will still have the same effect.

No links to people’s home pages for their companies for quotes or cited sources. Linking to sources’ Twitter handles, LinkedIn profile, or another type of bio page is OK.

No linking to gated content.

Any links that appear promotional or superfluous will be removed by editorial staff.

We reserve the right to add rel=”nofollow” to any link or remove a link at any time, before or after an article is published.

No links to websites in these areas: pills/RX, porn, gambling, and payday loans.

Buying, trading, or selling links is strictly prohibited. If someone approaches you to buy links in your articles, we’d appreciate you tipping us off (anonymously) via this form.


Use recent, relevant stats that support the authority and expertise of your piece. (Never use stats older than 5 years – it’s most likely outdated!)

Link to the original source only (i.e., study, survey, etc.). Stats roundup posts or third-party infographics don’t count as valid sources.

No unattributed stats. If you can’t find the original source, don’t use it.

Use the statistic itself (eg.: 46%) as anchor text, not the surrounding text.

Formatting & Grammar Tips

Use H2 headings for your subheadings.

Use H3 headings for sections within your subheadings. If you need to go another level deeper, it should be bold (not H4).

No span tags.

No div tags.

Avoid bolding within sentences.

No filler/font formatting that affects content appearance.

Write out single numbers “one..nine.” 10 and up are written as digits. Percentages are written as digits.

For Pete’s sake: one space after punctuation. Please.

We use start case (also known as initial caps) for all titles and subheadings. Start case is a simplified version of title case where every word is capitalized regardless of its function.

Examples of start case:

A Technical Guide To Google’s PageSpeed Insights Reports

How Google Responds To A Site Move

Images General Guidelines

Stock photos come from Shutterstock only: Search Engine Journal has a Shutterstock account. If you would like to include a Shutterstock stock photo with your article, please email your chosen photo’s link to Abby, Search Engine Journal’s Editorial Assistant: abby [at] chúng tôi to download it for you.

Please avoid Shutterstock images that are marked “Editorial.”

No stock photos from “free” stock photo websites: This includes websites such as Pexels, Pixabay, Unsplash, et. al. You will be asked to replace or suggest replacements for any stock photos that come from any sources other than Shutterstock, or the editorial team will replace it.

No transferring licenses: We do not accept stock images licensed by another person or organization via other paid stock photo providers (e.g., Adobe Stock, Getty Images).

Branded images: These are only acceptable in a news context, or in the context of a contributor citing a reputable source (e.g., Forrester, Gartner). Promotional images are not acceptable – images cannot include your company/agency logo or branding.

Disclose any business relationships: If there is an association between the contributor and the copyright owner for a branded image (e.g., contractor, brand ambassador, brand employee) this must be disclosed to the Managing Editor and Executive Editor.

Your own images: You can use relevant, unbranded images in your articles that you created (or your company created on your behalf – as long as any created images do not contain any copyrighted material), such as photographs you took.

Other guidelines you need to know:

PNGs only: Please.

Removing/replacing images: The Search Engine Journal editorial team reserves the right to replace or remove any images that you include without notice prior to publication. This could be because the image is deemed offensive, irrelevant to the post, has a negative connotation, or may violate these guidelines.

Featured Image Usage, Types & Attribution

Required: Upload a featured image (found on the right sidebar in WordPress) that is 1600 pixels wide and 840 pixels tall.

Please preview your post before submitting it to make sure your featured image is formatted correctly.

Attribution for a Featured Image that is a stock photo appears at the end of your article, underneath a horizontal line, italicized, unlinked. Here’s an example using this photo:

Featured Image: Dean Drobot/Shutterstock

Attribution for a custom Featured Image created by the Search Engine Journal team appears at the end of your article, underneath a horizontal line, italicized, unlinked. Here’s an example:

Featured Image: Paulo Bobita/Search Engine Journal

Attribution for a custom Featured Image created by you or your company appears at the end of your article, underneath a horizontal line, italicized, unlinked. Here’s an example:

Featured Image: John Dough/Example Marketing Company

In-post Image Usage, Types & Attribution Stock photos art (Shutterstock):

Credit goes in footer: Artist/Shutterstock (no link to Shutterstock)

Do not use images that are marked “Editorial.”

You can add text to images marked “Commercial”, not “Editorial.”

Composite photos that incorporate elements from two or more images must credit the source of both images and be marked: Search Engine Journal composite image: Artist/Shutterstock; Artist/Shutterstock.

Screenshot of a website

We cannot publish anything that may include stock images, original artwork, copyrighted photos, etc. in the background. Anything that may fall under copyright or identify a person/organization must be blurred or excluded.

Credit goes in caption: Name of website, Month Year (no link to the website).

Example: Screenshot from chúng tôi April 2023

Screenshot of a tool

Credit goes in caption: with Name of tool, Month Year (no link to tool)

Example: Screenshot from Google Search Console, July 2023

YouTube Still

Credit goes in caption: with Video Title, Name of YouTube Channel, Month Year (no link to video)

Example using this video – How does user feedback impact search results? #AskGooglebot, Google Search Central, July 2023

Screenshot from Google Search:

Credit goes in caption: with Screenshot from search for [search term], Search engine name, Month Year

Example: Screenshot from search for [buy television], Google, July 2023

Screenshot from Google Search:

Credit goes in caption: with Screenshot from Twitter user [username], Twitter, Month Year

Example: Screenshot from @namegoeshere/Twitter, December 2023

Other guidelines you need to know:

One stock photo per article: Unless otherwise approved by the Search Engine Journal editorial team. You can use the other types of images outlined above to help tell a compelling visual story (see In-post Image Types section, below).

No memes and GIFs. While we love them, there is debate on whether they fall under ‘fair usage‘. We prefer to play it safe. So avoid these gray areas that could potentially cost you and us time and money.

Instagram embeds: Embedding something from Instagram? You need to obtain written consent from the account holder. Otherwise, we can’t include it. (We also cannot accept screenshots of Instagram content to get around this due to potential copyright infringement issues.)

All in-post photos must be center-aligned, unless they are aligned with text.

No external links are allowed on images.

Republishing Content Guidelines

In order to avoid duplicate content issues with Google, we permit content to be republished 14 days after publishing on SEJ. You MUST use a canonical link.

Editorial Review and Corrections

If we find out authors aren’t writing their own posts, we reserve the right to reject or delete the post, as well as prohibit the author from writing for Search Engine Journal going forward.

We may add a disclaimer at the end of any article to disclose any relationships (or lack thereof) that either Search Engine Journal or the author may have with organizations mentioned in the article.

In the instance of corrections to byline, facts, or updates to published articles, Search Engine Journal reserves the right to edit any post at any time. Post changes may be noted with a note from the editor about the change and the reasoning for the update or change, if applicable.

Our Publishing Process

Contributors on the writing schedule: Posts are due 2 business days before your next publishing day.

Ad hoc contributors: Our goal is ~2 weeks turnaround from the time you submit your post draft to publication.

So, what happens when you’ve finished an awesome post and pressed that blue WordPress button “Submit for Review”?

Post Status: Submitted to Editor

When you’ve finished a post draft, you’ll press the big blue button. Your post will go through the first round of copyediting, link checking, and whether it passes our editorial rules above.

Post Status: Copyeditor Reviewing

This stage is where our Copyeditor gets out a red pen and corrects for:

Typos, grammar, content flow

Links. If the link is germane to the content, it stays. But include a link four times? Use keywords or calls-to-action? Too self-promotional? The red pen will spring into action.

Full disclosure. If you reference your company in the article, your connection as the author needs to be made clear. So instead of “ABC SEO published a case study…” it should read “My company, ABC SEO, published a case study…”.

Post Status: Ready for Scheduling

Get on your mark! This post will be sanity checked one last time by our Executive Editor before it’s sent out on its way into the world.

Post Status: Scheduled

It’s gonna go live!

Your Bio

Head to “Edit My Profile”.

Make sure to fill out your Biographical Info.

Add links to your personal Social Profiles:




Add your Company Details:

Your company.

Your position.

Your company’s URL.

Note: You are eligible to get a followed link from your SEJ profile page if you meet some basic criteria:

You must have written at least 5 SEJ articles.

You are on the SEJ writing schedule (or contribute articles on an ad hoc basis somewhat regularly – minimum 1-2 a year).

You agree not to abuse your link. Or you will lose it.

If you meet these criteria, and haven’t yet received your followed link, please let us know!

Missing Deadlines

We know you’re busy. Stuff comes up.

Just let us know. It only takes a couple of minutes to send us an email or private message.

If you miss 2 deadlines in a row, we’ll contact you to make sure you want to continue on as an SEJ Contributor.

If you miss 3 deadlines in a row, and fail to respond to communications from us, you will lose your status as an SEJ Contributor.


Hit us up here.

Google Planning Desktop Search For Mac Computers

Google Planning Desktop Search for Mac Computers

Google announced plans to offer its Google Desktop Search to Mac computers on Friday, introducing Google technology to a loyal group of computer users who are not using the Windows operating system. Reuters reports that Google’s chief executive did not lay out a set schedule for the Mac ready desktop search, but did confirm that it would be on the way soon when asked. “We intend to do it,” Schmidt said at a University of California-Los Angeles conference celebrating the Internet’s 35th anniversary.

Rueters reports that Schmidt added that the Google Mac Desktop Search “had to be rebuilt from the ground up because of the fundamental differences between the Mac OS and Windows.” Google desktop search currently works with only computers running off of Windows and comes as a 450 KB download file and installs locally on the system. It places a system tray icon, which runs consecutively in the background indexing files on the system. The background-running crawlers monitor the files and internet/chat sessions and keep the index up-to-date by indexing the system when the system is not busy.

Knowing Google and its other services, I had little doubt that the new tool from their stable would be incredible. A week using it and I am not disappointed. It consumes manageable system RAM, gives me results in a format I am most used to watching (Google’s web results) and best thing of all it will only improve from here.

Agreed, the software support is limited. You can search through only the most popular file formats. PDF and many other formats are currently not supported. However, it is just the beginning. Google learns fast and we can be sure an update would cover-up most of the requisitions. But one thing is for sure, they need to start realizing that there are browsers in the market other than Internet Explorer and some people do use email clients which are not from Microsoft’ stable. They seem to have taken the popular approach in the first beta supporting what an average computer user would be using in day-to-day life.

Update the detailed information about Wikiasari : The Answer For Search? on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!